Lawsuit Information Center

The Bard PowerPort, also called a BardPort, is a port catheter device implanted just under the skin to allow easy attachment to a catheter for intravenous delivery of fluids or medications.

The Bard PowerPort has inherent design and manufacturing flaws that make the device prone to fracturing and migrating out of position. This can cause severe injuries, including internal vascular damage, blood clots, infection, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, organ injury, and the need for surgery to remove or repair the device.

Individuals who suffered injuries because of a defective Bard PowerPort device are now bringing product liability lawsuits against the manufacturer of the PowerPort implants. Our firm is currently accepting new cases from anyone who had a Bard PowerPort port catheter device implanted and was injured because of a fracture, migration, infection, thrombosis, or another implant failure.

Video game addiction lawsuits are gaining momentum as families and individuals come forward to seek accountability from gaming companies for the harm caused by gaming addiction. These cases focus on holding video game manufacturers accountable for exploiting vulnerable players, particularly minors and young adults, through intentionally addictive game designs.

Gaming addiction has caused significant harm, including mental health struggles, social isolation, sleep disruption, academic decline, financial strain, and family conflict. The lawsuits allege that gaming companies prioritized profit over user safety by designing games to keep children and young adults playing longer, spending more money, and returning even when the games were harming them.

Our attorneys examine the rise of video game addiction lawsuits and key allegations such as failure to warn and intentional design defects that make games like Fortnite, Roblox, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto, Apex Legends, Madden, FIFA, and other online games so addictive.

Online gambling and sports betting addiction lawsuits focus on whether major betting platforms knowingly designed their products to foster compulsive gambling and failed to protect vulnerable users. These cases are not about casual bettors who lost money on a few bad wagers. People do not have a viable claim simply because they lost money. Instead, these lawsuits involve individuals who lost control, suffered serious harm, and were pulled deeper into addiction by platforms that profited from that loss of control.

The problem driving these lawsuits is that millions of people, including a growing number of teenagers and young adults, have developed gambling addictions tied to online betting platforms such as DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, and others. For vulnerable users, especially those whose brains are still developing, online gambling addiction can be devastating. It often leads to overwhelming debt, depression, anxiety, academic or career collapse, family breakdown, and in some cases, suicidal thoughts or attempts.

Lawsuits now being filed across the country allege that online sportsbooks were not merely offering gambling, but were deliberately engineered to keep users betting longer, more frequently, and with less awareness of risk. These claims focus on features such as so-called “risk-free” promotions, in-game wagering, push notifications, VIP incentives, and weak age verification systems. According to the lawsuits, these were not accidental design choices. They were tools used to drive compulsive behavior, even after warning signs of addiction became clear.

On this page, our national mass tort lawyers look at Call of Duty video game addiction lawsuits. We look at the features of Call of Duty that plaintiffs allege are intended to make the game highly addictive, Activision’s alleged failure to warn about the addictive nature of the game, the harmful effects of video game addiction, and the potential settlement value of these cases.

This page is not a review of Call of Duty. We are not here to rank the game, talk about graphics, or debate whether it is fun. The legal issue is whether Activision and the developers of Call of Duty designed and marketed a product that can cause foreseeable harm to minors and young adults, and whether they failed to warn families about that risk.

Our lawyers contend that Call of Duty addiction lawsuits are product liability cases. Activision is not being sued because Call of Duty is popular. It is being sued because plaintiffs allege the game was engineered with reward loops, progression systems, microtransactions, battle passes, social pressure, and endless online competition that can push vulnerable users into compulsive play.