Lawsuit Information Center

May 26, 2026

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit

The Bard PowerPort, also called a BardPort, is a port catheter device implanted just under the skin to allow easy attachment to a catheter for intravenous delivery of fluids or medications.

The Bard PowerPort has inherent design and manufacturing flaws that make the device prone to fracturing and migrating out of position. This can cause severe injuries, including internal vascular damage, blood clots, infection, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, organ injury, and the need for surgery to remove or repair the device.

Individuals who suffered injuries because of a defective Bard PowerPort device are now bringing product liability lawsuits against the manufacturer of the PowerPort implants. Our firm is currently accepting new cases from anyone who had a Bard PowerPort port catheter device implanted and was injured because of a fracture, migration, infection, thrombosis, or another implant failure.

May 25, 2026

Monsanto Roundup Lawsuit Update

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

In this post, our Roundup lawyers will give you:

An update on where things stand in the new $7.5 billion Roundup class action lawsuit settlement in May 2026
The likely direction the Roundup litigation will take moving forward, and

May 23, 2026

Depo Provera Lawsuit Settlements

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page is for victims considering filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit. Our lawyers provide the latest updates on these claims, explain the litigation process, and predict Depo Provera settlement amounts.

A new scientific study has provided stunning evidence that using Depo-Provera can cause brain tumors. Women who used Depo-Provera and subsequently developed a meningioma brain tumor can file a Depo-Provera lawsuit seeking financial compensation. This new evidence is leading to a wave of Depo-Provera lawsuits nationwide.

Our lawyers are speaking to over 100 women a week who used Depo-Provera and have been diagnosed with meningioma. Our law firm is committed to this litigation and handling Depo-Provera lawsuits for women who had at least two injections and were later diagnosed with a meningioma brain tumor. If you meet these criteria, we will make the process of signing up for this litigation easy for you. Contact our Depo-Provera lawyers today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.

May 22, 2026

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Uber is facing one of the largest waves of passenger sexual assault lawsuits in U.S. history. Survivors across the country allege that Uber drivers sexually assaulted them and that the company is legally responsible because it failed to screen drivers properly, ignored prior complaints, and did not implement basic safety measures.

These claims are now consolidated in In re: Uber Technologies Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (MDL No. 3084) in the Northern District of California. As of mid-May 2026, 3,057 plaintiffs in 30 states have joined the MDL, with the number expected to continue rising throughout 2026.

The first MDL trial began in January 2026, and the jury returned an $8.5 million verdict in early February. Our lawyers believe these are exceptionally strong cases. The evidence points to a pattern: repeated warnings about dangerous drivers, no action from Uber, and preventable assaults that followed. In the courtroom, that is the kind of timeline juries understand and respond to. It is also the kind of fact pattern that will lead to substantial Uber sexual assault settlement amounts.

May 21, 2026

NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Our lawyers are handling Similac and Enfamil infant formula lawsuits for families whose premature babies suffered or died from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after taking one of these formulas. Our law firm is reviewing NEC lawsuits in all 50 states.

Medical research links cow milk-based infant formulas such as Similac and Enfamil to a dangerous neonatal medical condition known as necrotizing enterocolitis. These newborn NEC formula lawsuits make many allegations. But at their core, they allege that the makers of these formulas knew of the risk of NEC and did nothing to warn families and give them a choice.

If your premature baby was diagnosed with NEC after being given Similac or Enfamil formula, you may be able to participate in a class action lawsuit against the formula companies and receive financial compensation for the harm that was done to your child.

May 20, 2026

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Currently, thousands of hernia mesh lawsuits are pending in courts across the country. Our hernia mesh lawyers are handling these cases in all 50 states. This page:

Discusses this litigation
Provides the latest 2026 updates and the latest hernia mesh Bard MDL-2846 news 0n the settlement

May 20, 2026

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Our lawyers are actively reviewing hair relaxer cancer lawsuits across all 50 states. This page provides:

Detailed news and updates on the chemical hair relaxer litigation,
Insights from our hair relaxer attorneys on how these lawsuits may unfold,

May 20, 2026

Mormon Church Sex Abuse Lawsuits

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

On this page, our lawyers will discuss LDS sexual abuse lawsuits against the Mormon Church (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints).

We will explain the legal requirements for bringing a Mormon Church sex abuse lawsuit, and our attorneys will also examine the expected average settlement payout value of remaining cases.

We expect more LDS Church sex abuse settlements in 2026. If you have a claim, contact us today at 800-553-8082 or get a free consultation.

May 19, 2026

Hand, Wrist, and Finger Injury Settlement Amounts

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Hand, wrist, and finger injuries are often undervalued by insurance companies because the body part is small. That is a mistake. A serious hand injury can change how you work, drive, cook, write, type, lift, dress, bathe, hold tools, or care for your family.

This page explains settlement amounts for hand, wrist, and finger injuries in car accidents, falls, workplace accidents, dog bites, premises liability claims, and other injury cases. We also look at verdicts and settlements to show what pushes these claims up or down in value.

Our attorneys also summarize recent verdicts and reported settlements from prior cases in which the plaintiff’s primary injury was a hand, wrist, or finger injury so that you can get a feel for jury payouts and settlement amounts in hand and wrist injury lawsuits.

May 19, 2026

Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

A spinal cord stimulator is an implantable medical device used to manage chronic pain, most often involving the back or spine. These systems are marketed as a way to reduce pain by interrupting nerve signals before they reach the brain. But for a growing number of patients, the device fails to help. It introduces new and sometimes permanent problems, including electrical shocks, burning pain, infections, lead migration, hardware failure, and repeat surgeries to reposition or remove equipment that was supposed to improve quality of life.

This page explains spinal cord stimulator lawsuits and why they are being filed nationwide. It focuses on what patients are alleging, how these devices have failed in real-world use, and why many of these cases go beyond ordinary medical malpractice claims. The most serious lawsuits do not center on a single surgical mistake. They examine how modern spinal cord stimulators were designed, tested, and approved, and whether patients were ever adequately warned about the risks that now recur repeatedly in medical records and FDA reports.

Many people arrive here with a practical question in mind: what do spinal cord stimulator settlement amounts look like, and how does compensation get calculated when a device causes lasting harm? That question cannot be answered in isolation. Settlement amounts and payouts are driven by the full medical timeline, including the cost of repeat surgeries, explantation, permanent loss of function, and the downstream consequences when a pain-management device leaves someone worse off than before it was implanted.