Lawsuit Information Center

May 1, 2026

Maryland Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Miller & Zois has some of the most highly regarded and successful Maryland medical malpractice lawyers. Our attorneys have earned tens of millions of dollars for our clients by successfully litigating medical malpractice cases throughout Maryland and Washington, DC. We care, and we can help you.

The purpose of this page is to tell you what you need to know to make the right decisions to maximize your medical malpractice settlement amount or jury payout. You only have one medical malpractice case. Our malpractice lawyers tell you what you need to know to make sure you get the most money possible.

If you have been the victim of medical malpractice in Maryland, contact us today for a free case evaluation. Call us at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.

April 27, 2026

Texas Personal Injury Settlement Amounts and Statistics

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page explores settlement amounts and jury awards in Texas personal injury cases. Our attorneys also dive deep into Texas personal injury law to help you better understand the law when bringing a personal injury claim in Texas.

If you’re a personal injury victim filing a compensation claim in Texas, you should know the potential range of settlement payouts for your case. Why? Monetary compensation is ultimately what a personal injury or wrongful death claim is all about. The purpose of the system is to put a dollar amount on your suffering, because that is all the civil justice system can provide for you.

This page is designed to survey how personal injury cases have been resolved in Texas, offering you the opportunity to align your claim with Texas personal injury lawsuit settlement statistics and example settlements and jury awards.

April 27, 2026

South Dakota Personal Injury Verdicts and Settlements

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

In South Dakota, personal injury law governs a wide range of legal disputes arising from incidents that cause physical injury, emotional distress, or other damages. These could include product liability, mass torts, automobile accidents, slip and falls, medical malpractice, and more.

Understanding potential settlement payouts and jury awards in personal injury cases is crucial. The compensation a plaintiff might receive in South Dakota depends on various factors such as the severity of the injuries sustained, the degree of fault or negligence involved, and the unique circumstances of the case.

This page delves into personal injury law in South Dakota, including the state’s laws and regulations, such as the statute of limitations, and looks at recent cases to provide examples of typical settlement amounts and jury payouts in South Dakota.

April 27, 2026

New Jersey Sex Abuse Lawsuits and Settlements

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Now more than ever, victims of sexual abuse and sexual assault can access the civil justice system in New Jersey to hold abusers and the institutions that enabled them accountable.

This page explains how sex abuse victims can bring civil lawsuits in New Jersey and get compensation. Our lawyers will discuss the newly amended statute of limitations for sex abuse civil cases in New Jersey. Finally, we will examine these cases’ potential settlement value and recent settlements and verdicts in New Jersey sex abuse lawsuits.

If you were the victim of sexual abuse and want to file a sex abuse lawsuit seeking compensation, call our legal team today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.

April 27, 2026

3M Earplug Lawsuit Update

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page provides the latest news and updates on the 3M earplug lawsuits and the settlement in 2024. We continue to update this page to provide information to victims, but you can find even more quality information from other plaintiffs in the over 10,000 comments below. We are not handling new 3M earplug lawsuits. Continue reading

April 26, 2026

Internal Bra Mesh Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Thousands of women who underwent internal bra breast surgery are now experiencing serious complications from the surgical mesh placed inside them, and many are pursuing legal action against the manufacturers that promoted these products for a use the FDA never approved.

Breast mesh lawsuits allege that manufacturers of products such as AlloDerm, GalaFLEX, Phasix, and AlloMax marketed their devices for breast reconstruction, augmentation, and revision surgeries even though those applications had never been adequately studied or approved by the FDA. Patients were not warned. Surgeons were not given enough information. So when complications developed, including infection, mesh failure, chronic pain, and the need for additional surgery, most women did not have the information to connect the dots from their problems to the problems with the devices.

This page explains the internal bra mesh lawsuit in plain English: what the legal claims are, who may be eligible, what complications may qualify, and what these cases may be worth.

April 21, 2026

Dupixent Lawsuit for T-Cell Lymphoma

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Dupixent (dupilumab) is a biologic medication used to treat atopic dermatitis, asthma, and other inflammatory conditions. It works by targeting specific immune pathways involved in allergic inflammation. For many patients with moderate to severe eczema, Dupixent has provided relief where topical medications failed. As a result, it has become one of the most widely prescribed biologic drugs for skin and respiratory conditions.

But for a growing number of patients, the experience with Dupixent has been very different. Over the past several years, doctors and researchers have reported cases in which patients treated with Dupixent were later diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily affects the skin. These reports have led to increasing scrutiny of whether Dupixent can worsen, accelerate, or mask CTCL in certain patients.

In many cases our lawyers are now investigating, patients who received Dupixent for newly diagnosed eczema and developed concerning symptoms within weeks or months, including swollen lymph nodes and worsening skin disease.

April 21, 2026

Zantac Lawsuit Update

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Our attorneys also provide the latest updates on the Zantac class action lawsuit (including the disastrous news that the class action judge dismissed all federal court Zantac lawsuits). This page was updated on April 21, 2026.

Zantac Cancer Lawsuit Updates 2026

The Zantac litigation has been a rollercoaster, filled with major victories, setbacks, and unexpected twists. From the initial discovery of NDMA contamination to the collapse of certain cases and the resurgence of others, this litigation has taken many turns.

April 19, 2026

Utah Personal Injury Verdicts and Settlements

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page explores settlement amounts and jury payouts in personal injury and medical malpractice lawsuits in Utah. Our attorneys also provide an analysis of Utah personal injury law.

If you are a victim of personal injury initiating a compensation claim in Utah, you’ll want to know the potential range of settlement payouts for your case. Why? Because the ultimate aim of a personal injury or wrongful death claim is financial compensation. That is all the civil justice system can give you: money.

This page is designed to examine how personal injury and medical malpractice lawsuits in Utah have been resolved. You will be tempted to align your claim with Utah personal injury settlement statistics, example settlements, and jury payouts.

April 19, 2026

Olympus Scope Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Between 2013 and 2024, contaminated Olympus duodenoscopes infected hundreds of patients at hospitals across the United States. At least 35 people died. The infections were caused by drug-resistant bacteria that no antibiotic could reliably kill. The patients had gone into the hospital for routine diagnostic procedures–gallstone evaluations, pancreatic biopsies, bile duct imaging–and came out with infections that would destroy their organs, land them in intensive care for months, or kill them outright.

The remarkable part is not that it happened. Medical devices fail. Infections occur. What makes the Olympus duodenoscope litigation extraordinary is that the company knew. Olympus knew its scopes could not be adequately cleaned. Olympus knew that bacteria were surviving the sterilization process and spreading from patient to patient. Olympus knew that people were dying. And for years, the company did almost nothing.

This page explains what went wrong, why it went wrong, and the legal options available to patients and families harmed by contaminated Olympus scopes. It is long. It is detailed. It is written for people who want to understand not just the claims being filed, but the science, the regulatory failures, and the corporate decisions that turned a solvable engineering problem into a public health catastrophe.