Articles Posted in Mass Torts

Women who were injured by serious adverse reactions to the Gardasil HPV vaccine are now filing lawsuits across the country. These lawsuits have been consolidated into a Gardasil class action MDL. Our lawyers are currently seeking Gardasil lawsuits from anyone who suffered serious injuries from this HPV vaccine such as premature ovarian failure, or premature menopause.

On this page, our Gardasil lawyers analyze these lawsuits and provide an estimate as to the potential settlement compensation payouts of successful Gardasil vaccine lawsuits.

About Gardasil

Exactech is a major manufacturer of implants used in total knee replacement and total ankle replacement surgeries. Over 150,000 people have Exactech implants in their knee or ankle. Exactech recently initiated a recall of all these implants due to a defect that causes the implants to wear out and fail prematurely.

In the wake of the Exactech recall and the class action lawsuit, thousands of patients with Exactech implants may file product liability lawsuits seeking financial compensation for the pain and expense associated with the premature failure of their joint implant.  These suits are being filed in the class action lawsuit in New York.  But there are also state court claims that are being filed, mostly in Florida.

In December 2022, Exactech’s defense team sent a letter to MDL Judge Garaufis last week explaining the status of their effort to get formal coordination between the federal MDL and the state court MDL in Florida. Exactech is pushing hard for the discovery in the state and federal proceedings to be combined to avoid doubling their defense costs. The plaintiffs in the Florida state court MDL have opposed this request.

According to a new study from NIH, using chemical hair straighteners or relaxers can cause uterine cancer. Care Free Curl hair relaxer by SoftSheen-Carson is one the leading brands of chemical hair relaxers on the market today. Many women who used Car Free (or other relaxer products) and subsequently developed uterine cancer may be able to file a hair relaxer lawsuit against the cosmetic companies who sell these products. Hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are already being filed around the country and could soon be consolidated into a class action MDL.

This post will review recent medical research linking relaxers to uterine cancer and the lawsuits being brought against SoftSheen-Carson regarding its Care Free line of relaxer products.

About Care Free Curl and Other Hair Relaxer Products

According to a new NIH study released this year, chemicals in hair relaxer products used by African American women can significantly increase the risk of uterine cancer, uterine fibroids, and endometriosis. Just For Me is a popular brand of hair relaxer that is marketed specifically for children and manufactured by Strength of Nature Global, LLC. Women with uterine cancer and other conditions are now filing Just For Me hair relaxer lawsuits against Strength of Nature and other cosmetic companies.

This post will explain the new scientific evidence regarding hair relaxer use, and uterine cancer, and the lawsuits being brought against Strength of Nature involving it’s Just For Me brand.

About Just for Me and Other Hair Relaxers

Medical research released this year shows that long-term use of chemical hair relaxer products can significantly increase the risk of uterine cancer, uterine fibroids, and endometriosis. One of the most popular brands of chemical hair relaxer is Motions®, which is manufactured by Strength of Nature Global, LLC. Hair relaxer product liability lawsuits are now being filed against Strength of Nature and other cosmetic companies by women who developed uterine cancer after using Motions relaxer products.

In this post, we will review the new scientific evidence showing that hair relaxers can cause uterine cancer and the hair relaxer lawsuits being brought against Strength of Nature involving its Motions relaxer products.

About Motions and Other Hair Relaxers

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) is diagnosed in over 80,000 people each year in the U.S., making it one of the more common cancer types. Recently, NHL has become one of the primary injuries in a number of class action mass torts because it has been linked to chronic exposure to certain chemicals. NHL is also at issue in many medical malpractice cases involving diagnostic errors.

This page will provide a basic medical overview of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and discuss its involvement in various product liability and mass tort cases.

The Lymphatic System

Millions of Black women in the U.S. use chemical hair relaxers or “hair perms” to straighten their hair. The latest medical research has found, however, that the chemicals in hair relaxer products can cause pregnancy complications and lead to premature birth.  Lawsuits are now being brought against the manufacturers of hair relaxers by women who used these products and had a baby born prematurely.

The lawyers at our firm are currently investigating potential new hair relaxer lawsuit cases from women who used chemical hair relaxers or hair perms for 10 years or longer and had a pregnancy that ended with a premature delivery (before 37 weeks). For a free consultation, contact our office today at 800-553-8082.


RELATED POSTS:

Our law firm is helping victims who want to file a hair relaxer lawsuit.  This page is about chemical hair straighteners causing breast cancer.  Our attorneys are assisting breast cancer victims in all 50 states.

Chemical hair relaxer (also known as “hair perm”) products are regularly used by many African American women in the U.S. Recent medical studies have now revealed that the chemicals in these products can cause breast cancer. Product liability lawsuits are now being filed by women who used hair relaxer for years and later developed breast cancer.

Chemical Hair Relaxers

In this post, we will provide a status update on what’s happening in the Atrium C-Qur hernia mesh litigation.

The Atrium hernia mesh MDL (Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation 16-md-2753) has over 2,500 cases consolidated in the U.S. District Court for New Hampshire. This is the smallest of the three hernia mesh MDLs that are currently pending around the country.

As of September 2022, the number lawsuits pending in the Atrium hernia mesh class action(the smallest of the big 3 hernia mesh MDLs) increased by 17 over the last monthly period (August 15 to September 15). This brings the total number of pending cases up to 3,308.

There  1,300 Zimmer NexGen knee product liability lawsuits are pending throughout the country.  Countless more victims are waiting on the sidelines (maybe soon to lose their rights because of the statute of limitations).

The progress on these knee replacement lawsuits in recent months can best be summarized by “well, they are coming along.”  Now, at least, there is a more concrete plan to move this litigation forward.

On March 24th, Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, the judge overseeing all the consolidated federal cases pending in the U.S. District Courts, identified six cases that will be part of the “initial tranche” of Zimmer NexGen bellwether trials. A bellwether trial consists of test cases that allow the parties to see what a jury will do with a claim that is typical of the class.  Why?  So the parties can get a better idea of the value of the cases.   These are called bellwether cases, often precursors for settlement talks, are expected to begin in 2015.

First introduced in 1995, NexGen Complete Knee Solution System was one of Zimmer’s most successful knee products.

In 2001, Zimmer attempted to capitalize on the success of this product line by releasing a modified version of the original design, the NexGen Flex line of products, designed to achieve 155 degrees of flexion.

Most components were approved without extensive trials or FDA investigation into their safety through the 510K fast-track approval program.  This FDA program allows medical devices to enter the market without requiring manufacturers to conduct clinical studies.

Instead, the manufacturer must only demonstrate the device is substantially equivalent to other similar products already on the market. So the actual product that goes into a patient’s knee is not tested like these medical devices should be tested.

Continue reading

Contact Information