Kern County Juvenile Hall Sex Abuse Lawsuit

On this page, our national sex abuse lawyers will . Juveniles held in detention at Kern County Juvenile Hall have frequently been subjected to sexual abuse and assault committed by staff and by other inmates. Victims of abuse at Kern County Juvenile Hall can file civil lawsuits against the state for negligently failing to protect them.

If you have a potential sex abuse lawsuit involving Kern County Juvenile Hall, call our California sex abuse lawyers, today at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation.

About Kern County Juvenile Hall

The Kern County Juvenile Detention Center (officially known as “James G. Bowles Juvenile Hall”) is a juvenile detention facility operated at the county level by the Kern County Probation Department. Kern County Juvenile Hall is located in Bakersfield, California and it accommodates both male and female juvenile offenders. The facility is primarily a short-term detention center that holds juveniles who have been charged and are awaiting adjudication.

Kern County Juvenile Hall is one of California’s oldest juvenile detention facilities still in operation. The facility was originally opened in 1952. Today, the facility can house up to 108 juvenile inmates. The average time of commitment is 42 days.

Juvenile inmates at Kern County Juvenile Hall are provided with all living necessities, including food, clothing, medical care, and educational services. Inmates are required to participate in structured programming at the facility, which includes educational instruction and outdoor activities and exercise.

Timeline of Kern County Juvenile Hall (James G. Bowles Juvenile Hall)

1952

Establishment of Kern County Juvenile Hall

Kern County Juvenile Hall officially opens in Bakersfield, California, designed as a short-term detention facility for juveniles awaiting court proceedings. Early years focus on punitive discipline rather than rehabilitation.

1970s

Growth of California’s Juvenile Detention System

California expands juvenile facilities statewide, including Kern County Juvenile Hall. Reports emerge of harsh conditions, with overcrowding and physical discipline common.

1980s

Growing Scrutiny of Juvenile Facilities

Reports of abuse and neglect surface in California juvenile halls. The California Youth Authority (CYA) is heavily criticized for inhumane conditions, while Kern County Juvenile Hall remains under county control with little oversight.

1990s

California Juvenile Justice System Faces Lawsuits

Multiple lawsuits are filed against California juvenile facilities for excessive force and mistreatment. In 1997, federal investigations into the CYA uncover widespread sexual and physical abuse. Kern County avoids major lawsuits but systemic issues persist.

Early 2000s

Federal and State Investigations Increase

Lawsuits against the CYA escalate, leading to mandated reforms. The Ella Baker Center for Human Rights publishes reports on the absolutely horrific conditions in juvenile detention. Former detainees from Kern County begin speaking out about physical and sexual abuse.

The Kern County Probation Department receives multiple complaints about inappropriate behavior by correctional officers but takes minimal corrective action

2010s

First Public Allegations of Sexual Abuse

In 2014, correctional officer Cesar Holguin Navejar is accused of sexually assaulting a female detaine. He is arrested and charged with multiple felony counts, including sexual battery and child molestation.

In 2016, A lawsuit is filed against Kern County and George Anderson, alleging sexual abuse of a female inmate at the juvenile hall. This marks the third such lawsuit and the second specifically naming Anderson.The court dismisses the case but the Ninth Circuit reverses and allows the civil lawsuit to proceed, leading to what is believed to be the first Kern County Juvenile Hall sex abuse settlement.

2020

California Announces Closure of State-Run Juvenile Facilities

Gov. Gavin Newsom signs a law shutting down the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) by 2023, shifting responsibility to counties like Kern, raising concerns about oversight.

2022

More Allegations and Lawsuits

Correctional officer Shaleah Ryman is arrested for molesting a 16-year-old detainee. Investigations uncover multiple incidents of sexual misconduct, highlighting systemic failures at Kern County Juvenile Hall.

2023

California’s DJJ Officially Closes

Kern County must now house more juvenile offenders. Reports suggest ongoing staff misconduct, and survivors begin filing lawsuits against the county for failing to prevent abuse.

January 1, 2024

Expanded Statute of Limitations for Abuse Claims

California eliminates the statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse claims. More survivors file lawsuits against Kern County Juvenile Hall and the Probation Department.

2025

Potential Large Settlements Expected

Legal experts predict large settlements for survivors of sexual abuse, with claims that county officials ignored warning signs.

 

Sexual Abuse of Inmates at Kern County Juvenile Hall

New reports and investigations have recently revealed that sexual abuse of inmates at juvenile detention facilities in California has been a major systemic problem for a long time. Kern County Juvenile Hall is one of the detention centers at which juvenile inmates were frequently subjected to sexual assault and abuse, primarily at the hands of adult staff members who were supposed to protect them.

What Qualifies as Sexual Abuse?

For purposes of filing a civil lawsuit, sexual abuse is generally defined as any form of “sexual contact” or touching that is done without consent. Sexual touching means contact with a person’s private areas done for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification. This can range from groping breasts to penetration.

The second element of the definition of sexual abuse is lack of consent. If the victim consents to the contact, it is not abuse. In the case of juvenile inmates, however, consent is usually not an issue. Under California law, minors under the age of 18 lack the legal capacity to consent to sexual contact with an adult. This means that ANY sexual contact between an adult and a minor is without consent.

Holding Kern County Liable for Sexual Abuse of Juvenile Inmates

The Kern County Probation Department (“KCPD”) has full operational control and responsibility for Kern County Juvenile Hall. This includes screening, hiring, training, and properly supervising and monitoring staff members at the facility. KCPD was also legally obligated to take all reasonable measures to ensure the safety and well-being of juvenile inmates at the facility.

KCPD has a clear legal duty to ensure the safety of juvenile inmates at Kern County Juvenile Hall. This means that KCPD can be held liable in a civil lawsuit if it negligently failed to ensure the safety of inmates, resulting in acts of sexual assault or abuse. There is a growing body of evidence establishing systemic negligence on the part of KCPD in protecting its juvenile inmates from sexual abuse, particularly abuse by predatory staff members.

Many former correctional officers and/or staff members at Kern County Juvenile Hall have been credibly accused and/or prosecuted for sexual abuse of juvenile inmates under their control. There is evidence that KCPD’s negligence enabled this abuse to occurred in a number of ways. Most significantly, KCPD repeatedly ignored and failed to investigate complaints from juvenile inmates about abuse or inappropriate conduct by staff members.

Abuse by Officer George Anderson

A number of former female juvenile inmates at Kern County Juvenile Hall have come forward with allegations that they were sexually abused by a former correctional officer named George Anderson. Some of these women have filed lawsuits against KCPD that resulted in financial settlements.

Between 2005 and 2015, George Anderson worked at Kern County Juvenile Hall as a correctional officer. In civil lawsuit brought by 3 different female inmates, Officer Anderson was accused of very similar acts of sexual abuse. Officer Anderson would watch the girls in the shower, then start grooming his victims. Anderson would make sexually explicit comments about the girls and eventually solicit sex from them.

The lawsuits alleged that Anderson’s abuse of these female inmates was the result of KCPD’s negligence. The lawsuits claimed that KCPD had received numerous prior complaints about Anderson watching female inmates while they showered, but did nothing about it. They also accused KCPD of negligence in failing to exercise proper oversight and training.

California’s Statute of Limitations for Juvenile Detention Center Sexual Abuse Claims

California’s statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse cases is complicated, and recent changes to the law have made it even more so. Survivors may hear that there is “no statute of limitations” for filing lawsuits, but that only applies in certain situations. The time limits depend on when the abuse happened, and not all survivors benefit from the new rules. Here’s how the deadline to sue works in these cases:

For survivors whose abuse happened on or after January 1, 2024, there is no time limit to file a lawsuit. That means a survivor can sue their abuser or any responsible institution at any time, even decades later.

For survivors whose abuse happened on or before December 31, 2023, different rules apply. California previously allowed survivors to file lawsuits until age 40 or within five years of realizing the abuse caused them harm, whichever was later. That law is still in effect for older cases. If a survivor had already missed that deadline before 2024, they do not get unlimited time under the new law.

There is one other major change that affects survivors who were abused in government-run facilities like juvenile detention centers. Normally, lawsuits against government entities require filing a special claim first, often within a very short window. But under this law, survivors of childhood sexual abuse do not have to go through that process and can sue the state or county directly.

This law also includes extra protections for survivors seeking damages against institutions that covered up the abuse. If a survivor can prove a cover-up, they may be entitled to three times the compensation payout that the jury awards to further punish them for what they did.

FAQs About Kern County Juvenile Hall Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Is There an Active Class Action Lawsuit Against Kern County Juvenile Hall?
There is no class action lawsuit yet and we do not expect there will be one. But survivors have filed individual claims against Kern County for sexual abuse and misconduct at the juvenile hall. Many of these sexual abuse lawsuits allege that the Kern County Probation Department failed to protect youth detainees from abuse by staff and other inmates. Given the volume of cases, there is growing belief that these lawsuits could lead to a global settlement or class action-style compensation scheme to resolve most or all of these lawsuits.
What Is the Settlement Value of a Kern County Juvenile Hall Sex Abuse Lawsuit?
As we talk about just below, the settlement payouts victims may see will depend on multiple factors, including the severity of the abuse, the length of time it occurred, and whether there were prior complaints ignored by the county. Prior settlements against Kern County have ranged from $200,000 to $400,000 for cases involving inappropriate sexual behavior (e.g., correctional officers watching female inmates in the shower).
But serious cases, including sexual assault or penetration, could settle for $500,000 to $1 million or more. If a jury finds gross negligence or a cover-up, the payout could be even higher, as California law allows treble damages in cover-up cases.
Who Can File a Lawsuit Against Kern County Juvenile Hall?
Anyone who was sexually abused or assaulted at Kern County Juvenile Hall—by either a staff member, correctional officer, or another detainee—may have a claim. The California statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse now allows survivors to file lawsuits at any time if the abuse happened in 2024 or later. Survivors of earlier abuse may still be eligible but should consult an attorney to determine if their case qualifies.
Can I Still Sue If the Abuse Happened Years Ago?
Yes, but it depends on when the abuse occurred: abuse in 2024 or later has no time limit, and you can sue at any time. Abuse before 2024 generally allows you to file until age 40 or five years from discovering the abuse caused harm, whichever is later. If your case was already time-barred before 2024, the new law does not reopen it, but you should still speak to a lawyer because exceptions may apply.
How Does the California Youth Authority (CYA) Tie Into These Lawsuits?
The California Youth Authority (CYA), later renamed the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), operated many of California’s worst juvenile detention centers before it was shut down in 2023. While Kern County Juvenile Hall was not part of DJJ, the same culture of abuse and neglect that led to DJJ’s closure is central to the lawsuits against Kern County. Many lawsuits argue that Kern County ignored the same warning signs that plagued DJJ facilities for decades.
Was There a Cover-Up of Sexual Abuse at Kern County Juvenile Hall?
Lawsuits against Kern County suggest a pattern of cover-ups. Survivors claim that the Kern County Probation Department ignored multiple complaints about sexual abuse by staff members, including Correctional Officer George Anderson and Officer Shaleah Ryman, who were later arrested. The county’s failure to act could make them liable for triple damages under California law if a court determines they engaged in a deliberate cover-up.
What Should I Do If I Want to File a Lawsuit?
If you were sexually abused at Kern County Juvenile Hall, you should speak with a lawyer who focuses on juvenile detention center sexual abuse lawsuits, gather any evidence (including medical records, journal entries, emails, or testimony from others who may have witnessed the abuse), and file a claim as soon as possible, even if you’re unsure whether the statute of limitations applies to you. Legal deadlines are complicated, and delays can hurt your case, so getting an attorney involved early is critical.
Are There Any Upcoming Settlement Payouts in the Kern County Juvenile Hall Lawsuits?
While no mass settlement has been publicly announced, many believe that a global settlement could happen soon, similar to what has occurred in other juvenile facility sex abuse cases. If you are considering a claim, you do not want to be left out when settlements are negotiated. You are better served having the option to settle than trying to get in after the deadline.
How Do I Prove My Claim If I Was Abused at Kern County Juvenile Hall?
Your case may be supported by your testimony, witness statements, internal reports or complaints, and law enforcement or investigative reports. Many survivors worry about lack of physical evidence, but lawsuits do not require it. Courts recognize that most sexual abuse cases rely on survivor testimony.
Is the Lawsuit Against Kern County Juvenile Hall a Class Action?
Right now, these are individual lawsuits, but if enough cases are filed, they could be consolidated into a mass tort or class action lawsuit. But our lawyers do not think this would lead to quicker settlements and larger payouts for victims. We are best served staying the current course.
How Much Time Do I Have to File a Lawsuit?
If you were sexually abused at Kern County Juvenile Hall, it depends on when the abuse happened: after January 1, 2024, there is no deadline, and you can file at any time. Abuse before January 1, 2024, generally allows you to file until age 40 or five years from discovering the harm. If your case was already time-barred before 2024, the law does not automatically reopen old cases, but exceptions may apply. Since California’s sexual abuse statute of limitations is complex, it is best to talk to a lawyer about your options and your specific deadline to sue Kern County or the state of California.

Settlement Value of Kern County Juvenile Hall Sex Abuse Lawsuits

The settlement value of sex abuse lawsuits brought by former juvenile inmates at Kern County Juvenile hall will generally depend on a the severity and duration of the abuse, and the extent of KCPD’s negligence. Cases involving more severe acts of abuse (e.g., penetration) occurring over a long time period will have a high settlement value. Those in which there is clear evidence of obvious negligence on the part of KCPD, such as prior complaints of misconduct about the abuser, will also have a high settlement value.

In the case of Kern County Juvenile Hall, we have a very good idea of the potential settlement compensation payout of sex abuse cases because there have been at least three reported settlements. The 3 settlements came in the abuse cases involving Officer George Anderson. The lawsuits brought by the 3 alleged victims of Anderson eventually settled for $200,000, $250,000, and $400,000. What was unique about those 3 cases is that the abuse did not involve any significant sexual contact involved by Anderson. The allegations of abuse involved Anderson watching the girls in the shower (a privacy violation) and then sexually soliciting them.

This means that the potential settlement amounts of a sexual abuse case involving more significant physical contact, such as actual penetration, or even just groping, will likely have an even higher settlement value. In fact, we think an abuse case in which the juvenile inmate was sexually assaulted could have a potential settlement value of $500,000 to $1 million.

Contact Us About Kern County Juvenile Hall Sex Abuse Cases

If you were sexually abused as an inmate at Kern County Juvenile Hall, you may be able to file a lawsuit and get compensation. Reach out to us online or call 800-553-8082.

 

Contact Information