Ozempic Lawsuit

Our lawyers are investigating Ozempic lawsuits for patients with NAION, gastroparesis or gastrointestinal conditions, including bowel obstruction or cyclic vomiting syndrome.

Ozempic is the popular brand name for semaglutide, a prescription drug approved for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. As we all know, Ozempic is also commonly used as a weight management drug. Recent scientific studies have shown that taking Ozempic, particularly at higher doses, can cause gastroparesis.

Until recently, the warning label for Ozempic did not correctly notify patients or doctors about the risk of these injuries. Anyone who suffered injuries after taking Ozempic may be able to get financial compensation for their injuries by filing a product liability lawsuit.

There are now lawsuits involving Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy, Trulicity, and Mounjaro that, as of February 2024, is an MDL class action lawsuit. This page will provide the latest news and updates on the Ozempic litigation, as well as our predictions about the potential settlement value of these cases.

Our Ozempic Lawyers Are Taking 8 Types of Claims

1. Gastroparesis or stomach paralysis – this is the signature injury of this litigation
2. Hospitalization for over one day for GI issues
3. Esophageal injury requiring surgery
4. Ileus or bowel obstruction
5. NEW: Sudden Vision Loss or NAION (nonarthritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy)
6. DVT and related injuries, including death
7. Pulmonary aspiration
8. Gallbladder injury with surgery (Started taking drug prior to 2022)

If you have an Ozempic lawsuit, call our lawyers today at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online for a free consultation.

Ozempic Lawsuit Updates

Our Ozempic lawyers are committed to bringing you the latest updates on this litigation.  Come back frequently. Our attorneys are updating this page whenever there is a new development so we find something we think you should know.

November 20, 2024 – New Master Complaint

November 13, 2024 – New Lawsuit

In a new lawsuit filed as part of the national MDL for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in Philadelphia, a Tennessee woman alleges that Novo Nordisk’s drugs, Ozempic and Wegovy, caused her to develop severe, chronic gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis.

The plaintiff, prescribed Ozempic in 2022 to manage diabetes and weight, soon began to experience persistent vomiting, nausea, and extreme stomach discomfort. After ongoing symptoms, she underwent a gastric emptying study in early 2023, a diagnostic test widely regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing delayed gastric emptying or gastroparesis, which confirmed her condition. This objective test result is likely to be significant evidence in the litigation.

her lawsuit alleges, as they all do, that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn users and healthcare providers of the drugs’ severe gastrointestinal risks, including gastroparesis, stomach paralysis, and intestinal blockages—risks the plaintiff argues the company either knew or should have known based on prior clinical studies and adverse event data. She also alleges Novo Nordisk downplayed these risks in its marketing, portraying the drugs as safe, effective, and essential for weight management, while omitting critical information about the drugs’ serious side effects and the likelihood of weight regain if discontinued.

November 12, 2024 – Minimizing Gastroparesis Risks

As cases mount in the Ozempic MDL, new filings are drilling down on the claim that Novo Nordisk systematically downplayed gastroparesis risks in its marketing.  Plaintiffs’ lawyers allege Novo Nordisk was aware of Ozempic’s impact on stomach motility but resisted adjusting the warning labels, fearing it could dissuade users from starting or continuing treatment. The reluctance to address gastroparesis risks early on will be a key focus in this litigation as many lawyers have stopped talking cases that do not involve gastroparesis.

November 7, 2024 – New Ozempic Warning for Pulmonary Aspiration

Federal regulators have issued new warnings for popular GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro, linking them to the risk of pulmonary aspiration during elective surgeries.

These medications slow stomach emptying, which may lead to vomiting and dangerous aspiration while under anesthesia. Although experts raised concerns about this risk months ago, these warnings were only recently added. The FDA advises patients to tell healthcare providers they are on GLP-1 drugs before any surgery.

Yet another warning update for GLP-1 drugs signals an evolving understanding that is woven through so many of these updates on this page.  Despite their widespread use, the full impact of these medications remains unknown. Each new caution serves as a reminder that we’re still learning about the risks and benefits Ozempic and this class of drugs.

November 4, 2024 – Gastric Emptying Studies Grow in Importance

The MDL judge’s seems to have questions about whether plaintiffs can prove that gastroparesis is caused by Ozempic or even whether an individual plaintiff can prove they have gastroparesis. So there is a new emphasis how to nail down whether a patient had gastroparesis and the fear that even though a doctor’s diagnosis should be enough, it won’t be.

That has led to a new emphasis on gastric emptying studies as a a key element of proof in the GLP-1 agonist litigation. These studies, which measure the rate at which food leaves the stomach, are considered the most objective way to identify delayed gastric emptying, a primary symptom and clinical hallmark of gastroparesis.

As the litigation progresses, gastric emptying studies will increasingly be viewed as the key pathway to substantiating claims that drugs like Ozempic may alter gastrointestinal motility. Presenting gastric emptying study results in court not only provides scientific support but also helps distinguish true cases of gastroparesis from other digestive issues.

November 1, 2024 – MDL Growth Continues

The GLP-1 receptor agonists class action MDL remains active, though growth is beginning to show signs of slowing. Following a surge of over 400 new cases in August and September, October saw a smaller addition of 131 cases, bringing the total to 1,221 pending lawsuits.

This reduced growth rate may reflect a shift among attorneys who are tightening their criteria for accepting new cases as the litigation progresses. Few lawyers are still taking gallbladder claims, for example. With the focus increasingly on strong, well-documented claims of gastroparesis, we’re likely to see more selective case growth moving forward.

October 30, 2024 – New Scheduling Order

The court put out a new scheduling order:

What we are willing to do on here is tell you the truth.  This schedule is depressing. This will be a long process.  All this is just to the point of getting to the individual lawsuits and doing more discovery on the defendants if we win.  You already see Ozempic lawyers tightening their criteria because they realize this will be a long-term project. So pack a lunch, this is going to take a while.

October 29, 2024 – Problems Making Ozempic

October 18, 2024 – New Ozempic Lawsuit

In a new lawsuit filed yesterday, a DeRidder, Louisiana resident claims severe harm from the diabetes drug Ozempic, manufactured by Novo Nordisk. The plaintiff, who had been prescribed Ozempic for diabetes management starting in June 2023, was diagnosed with gastroparesis—a severe gastrointestinal condition that causes stomach paralysis—within months of using the drug.

The lawsuit alleges that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn consumers about the risk of gastroparesis and other serious gastrointestinal issues, which the company knew or should have known based on clinical data and adverse event reports. The plaintiff further claims that the drug’s labeling and marketing misrepresented the safety profile of Ozempic, omitting critical information about long-term side effects such as gastrointestinal blockages, malnutrition, and chronic stomach disorders.

October 17, 2024 – Marketing Discovery Shut Down by MDL Judge

We have been talking about Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the MDL judges’ earlier decision to limit discovery until we address the “cross-cutting” issues first (see our September 1 and other updates on this below). Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ want broader access to the defendants’ marketing practices, arguing that these marketing efforts directly impacted the adequacy of the drug’s warnings related to gastrointestinal injuries like gastroparesis and severe nausea.

The court has ruled that that early pre-trial discovery will focus on two central issues: the adequacy of the drugs’ warning labels and the possibility of federal preemption. Plaintiffs had hoped to expand the discovery to include marketing materials, particularly those targeting doctors and consumers, believing that these marketing efforts could dilute the impact of warning labels and influence patients’ understanding of the risks.

Unfortunately, and incorrectly in our view,  the court ruled that marketing discovery is not necessary at this early stage,. The judge wants to drill down only on the FDA-approved warning labels and whether these labels were adequate in conveying the risks, ignoring arguments that marketing informs the failure to warn case. So, for now, discovery will center on what the FDA knew and approved regarding the warning labels when these drugs were released.

This ruling narrows the scope of the early litigation to critical legal questions and postpones broader marketing-related inquiries, which Plaintiffs had hoped to pursue sooner.

October 4, 2024 – 101 New Cases Added to MDL

The Ozempic class action MDL continues to grow fairly rapidly in size. After adding over 300 new cases in August, another 101 new cases were transferred into the MDL in September. That brings the total number of pending cases up to 1,090.

September 29, 2024 – Battle Over Scope of Early Discovery

Defendants recently opposed plaintiffs’ request for limited marketing discovery that we discussed in our September 1 update.  They argue it is unnecessary due to the court’s bifurcation order, which focuses on resolving label adequacy and preemption issues first. According to defendants, only the printed label and FDA communications are needed for these rulings.

This is wrong. Marketing materials, brochures, and promotional content are part of the “label” under FDA regulations and relevant to whether defendants adequately warned about risks like gastroparesis. Recent legal precedent, including a brand new Third Circuit ruling in In re Fosamax just this month, underscores that a drug’s label includes all materials disseminated to prescribers, not just what is on the bottle.

Plaintiffs also highlight that defendants cannot cite a single case where similar preemption or warning adequacy issues were resolved without marketing discovery. The cases defendants do reference—Taxotere and Meridia—involved marketing discovery before summary judgment was reached. Excluding this evidence, plaintiffs argue, would undermine the court’s ability to fully assess whether the drug warnings were adequate and legally sufficient.

Keep in mind, plaintiffs are not seeking a blanket expansion of discovery but merely clarification that marketing materials can be included, as they directly influence physicians’ understanding of risks and the adequacy of drug warnings. Plaintiffs argue that without this discovery, the court cannot properly determine if the warnings were diluted or minimized in promotional efforts.

In short, plaintiffs believe the Ozempic defendants are using the bifurcation order as a shield to avoid turning over critical evidence—which our lawyers suspect will make them look terrible. They urge the court to allow marketing discovery, so it has a complete picture of how the drugs were promoted and whether that promotion aligns with the printed warnings, which is essential to deciding the key issues in the case.

September 12, 2024: Pretrial Discovery

The court has scheduled early discovery and motion practice regarding preemption and the adequacy of warning labels. The issue of marketing discovery, however, was not fully considered, and plaintiffs are seeking permission in a new motion to include marketing discovery at this early stage.

Plaintiffs argue that marketing discovery is crucial to the case, as pharmaceutical companies often dilute or downplay risks in their marketing efforts, which can negate warnings provided in labels.  This is probably especially true with the money on the line in this case.  There are ample precedent for the idea that marketing is relevant to the adequacy of warnings and preemption defenses.

September 6, 2024: New Ozempic Lawsuit Filed Yesterday

A Kentucky woman has filed a new lawsuit in the MDL against Novo Nordisk yesterday.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, who resides in Covington, Kentucky, suffered from severe injuries after using Ozempic from January 2023 to April 2023. She was later diagnosed with gastroparesis, the signature injury in this litigation.  Gastroparesis, as most of you know, is a condition that paralyzes the stomach, leading to significant health issues including severe vomiting, abdominal pain, and the need for emergency medical treatment.

The lawsuit claims that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn users of the potential severe gastrointestinal risks associated with Ozempic, such as gastroparesis, despite being aware of these risks. The plaintiff argues that the drug’s labeling and promotional materials were misleading, downplaying the severity of side effects and failing to disclose the potential for serious gastrointestinal issues. The lawsuit further asserts that Novo Nordisk’s aggressive marketing and promotion of Ozempic, including extensive television advertising and marketing materials that we have all seen that highlight weight loss benefits, contributed to the widespread use of the drug without proper warnings regarding its risks.

The plaintiff is seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries, pain, suffering, and medical expenses, as well as punitive damages, alleging that Novo Nordisk acted recklessly by continuing to market Ozempic without adequate safety warnings.

September 2, 2024: New Ozempic Suicide Study

A new study “Disproportionality Analysis From World Health Organization Data on Semaglutide, Liraglutide, and Suicidality” scrutinizes the potential relationship between GLP-1 receptor agonists—specifically semaglutide and liraglutide—and an increase in reports of suicidal thoughts. It found a particularly strong signal of increased suicidal ideation in patients using semaglutide alongside other medications like antidepressants and benzodiazepines. There is now talk of a Ozempic suicide warning.

In the bigger picture, all of these new studies are underscoring an unsettling gap in our knowledge about the safety of these drugs. It underscores a pressing need for more comprehensive research to ensure these drugs do not pose even more hidden risks.

Are our Ozempic lawyers taking suicide and suicidal ideations lawsuits? No.  But that could change after we dig deeper into the evidence.

September 1, 2024: Plaintiffs’ Ozempic Lawyers Urge Getting All of the Evidence

It is pretty clear the defendants would like to have the judge rule on the cross-cutting issues we have been talking about without full discovery.  Plaintiffs’ attorneys, in a letter to the judge, want to cool the jets on that thinking.

The Plaintiffs argue that general causation should not be decided prematurely without comprehensive discovery, stressing the importance of a detailed examination of evidence through the Bradford Hill criteria.

You will be hearing a lot about Bradford Hill in the Ozempic litigation. The Bradford Hill criteria consist of a group of principles that help determine causal relationships between a specific factor and a disease. These criteria do not serve as definitive proof of causation but rather as guidelines to assess whether the relationship between Ozempic and health consequences like gastroparesis is likely causal.

The Plaintiffs contend that a full exploration of this evidence is essential not only to address the specific allegations but also to ensure that the evaluation of general causation is grounded in a robust factual and scientific context. They argue against limiting the scope of discovery to predefined categories that might not capture all relevant data, thereby potentially compromising the reliability and comprehensiveness of the causation analysis.

So plaintiffs’ attorneys are asking the judge for full pre-trial discovery and request that the court resist any attempt to streamline or expedite this process might lead to an incomplete or misleading analysis.

August 29, 2024: Defendants Jumping on “Cross-Cutting” Issues Order

Defendants sent the judge a letter to Judge Marston jumping on the “cross-cutting” issues order we wrote about on August 24.  The defendants have pushed for early discovery on general causation issues and won, putting the early focus of discovery on the reliability of gastroparesis diagnostic testing and the adequacy of the warning labels provided by the manufacturers.

Defendants think they see a path to end this litigation early and they are showing the judge how eager they are to get on with it. I don’t think they have much a of a chance on either issue.

August 27, 2024: New Video

We put up a new Ozempic lawsuit video that gives you an update on the latest in the litigation.

August 24, 2024: New Court Order

The court has granted the defendants’ request for early discovery and motion practice on two pivotal issues:

1. the reliability of gastroparesis diagnostic testing, and
2. the adequacy of the warning labels provided by the manufacturers.

The court agreed that these “cross-cutting” issues are central to the litigation and could significantly influence the scope of the claims.

Specifically, the court will address whether gastroparesis can be reliably diagnosed without objective testing and whether the FDA-approved warning labels were sufficient under federal law, potentially preempting state law claims.

The court has requested further briefings on the third issue, general causation, to determine whether GLP-1 receptor agonists are capable of causing the alleged injuries. The ruling on this issue has been deferred until after additional information is provided. A comprehensive scheduling order will be established after the next status conference on September 16, 2024, where the parties will propose deadlines for discovery and motions on the approved issues.

This order puts plaintiffs in a more defensive posture than we would like at this stage of the litigation. But Ozempic lawyers are confident that plaintiffs will win these battles.

August 21, 2024: New Mounjaro/Trulicity Lawsuit

A new lawsuit has been filed by a Kentucky woman seeking damages for severe injuries allegedly caused by the use of Mounjaro and Trulicity, manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company.

The plaintiff claims that these medications, used to control blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes, caused her to develop gastroparesis, a severe and chronic condition that affects stomach motility. The complaint alleges that Eli Lilly failed to adequately warn consumers and healthcare providers about the risks associated with these drugs, particularly the risk of gastroparesis, despite being aware of the potential dangers.

The plaintiff asserts multiple causes of action, including inadequate warning, fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, and negligent misrepresentation. The diet drug lawsuit details that Eli Lilly downplayed the severity of gastrointestinal side effects and failed to provide sufficient warnings or studies regarding the risk of gastroparesis associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists, the class of drugs to which Mounjaro and Trulicity belong.

Critically, the plaintiff claims that had she or her prescribing physician been properly informed, she would not have used these medications and suffered the resulting injuries.

August 15, 2024 – MDL Attorneys’ Fees

New Case Management Order No. 17 outlines the MDL fee in the Ozempic class action. From any gross monetary recovery—whether from settlement, judgment, or other forms of monetary relief—9% is allocated to the GLP-1 Fee Fund. This fund is designed to compensate the Ozempic attorneys for their legal services that benefit all plaintiffs involved in the MDL.

An additional 2% of the gross monetary recovery is allocated to the GLP-1 Expense Fund. This fund covers expenses incurred during the litigation that are considered beneficial for all plaintiffs, such as costs related to discovery, expert analysis, and other litigation-related expenditures.

What is this attorneys’ fee about and does it impact you? In an MDL, a common benefit fee is a mechanism designed to fairly distribute the costs of litigation among all plaintiffs who benefit from the collective efforts of the attorneys in leadership. These are the attorneys who perform work that benefits the entire group of plaintiffs, such as conducting discovery, engaging experts, and preparing for trial.

The exact distribution and impact on the attorney’s fees and the client’s recovery can vary as we saw in the 3M earplug MDL. You will have to pay the 2% in expenses, most likely. But typically, the money for leadership’s attorneys’ fees is coming out of your lawyer’s pocket, not yours. So if you have a 40% contingency fee, your lawyer is getting 31%, and MDL leadership is getting the other 9%.

August 11, 2024 – New Ozempic Gastroparesis Lawsuit

A New Hampshire residents suffering from Type 2 diabetes filed an Ozempic lawsuit this week. She used Ozempic from June 2022 to September 2023.  She was diagnosed with gastroparesis, a condition which, as you like know if you are reading this, paralyzes the stomach muscles, preventing proper digestion.

The plaintiff alleged that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with Ozempic, leading to severe and permanent personal injuries, pain, and emotional distress.

This lawsuit was filed directly in the MDL.

August 8, 2024 – Science Day

Judge Karen Spencer Marston has scheduled a “Science Day” for September 4, 2024.

Science Day is a unique proceeding in complex litigations, especially those involving pharmaceuticals, where both parties present an objective overview of the relevant medical and scientific issues to the court. This event allows the judge to better understand the underlying science, including how GLP-1 RAs work, their medical uses, and the injuries alleged by plaintiffs, such as gastroparesis and deep vein thrombosis.

The presentations will focus strictly on scientific information, excluding individual plaintiff cases or marketing practices, and will be non-discoverable to encourage open and informative discussion. Although everyone will pretend to present unbiased information, lawyers on both sides will aim to influence Judge Marston’s understanding of the science in a way that aligns with their perspectives.

August 1, 2024 – New Mounjaro/Ozempic Lawsuit

An Illinois man has filed a new lawsuit against Novo Nordisk  and Eli Lilly alleging, among other things, the failure to warn about the risks of their weight loss drugs, Ozempic and Mounjaro,

In October 2022, the plaintiff was prescribed Ozempic by his endocrinologist for diabetes management. The plaintiff continued using Ozempic until January 2023. Subsequently, he switched to Mounjaro, also prescribed by his endocrinologist, for the same purpose.

On June 10, 2023, the plaintiff was admitted to the hospital with chest discomfort, which later escalated to severe abdominal pain. A CT scan revealed abnormal thickening in the proximal jejunal small bowel and an internal hernia, suggesting ischemia and bowel obstruction. The next day, June 11, 2023, the plaintiff underwent ischemic bowel resection surgery.

His suit, which was filed in Illinois but will be transferred to the MDL class action lawsuit pending in Pennsylvania, seeks compensation for his injuries, medical expenses, pain, and suffering, which he attributes to the defendant’s negligence and deceptive practices.

July 9, 2024 – Direct File GLP-1 Lawsuits:

You can now directly file an Ozempic lawsuit into MDL No. 3094, which addresses claims related to GLP-1 receptor agonists. A new order allows plaintiffs to directly file cases in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to enhance administrative efficiency and centralize pretrial proceedings.

Direct filing will not determine future jurisdiction or venue. The order also introduces a streamlined service process, with Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk agreeing to waive formal service and accept email service. Additionally, it mandates that directly filed cases name no more than a single plaintiff, although consortium and derivative plaintiffs are allowed.

July 8, 2024 – Status Conference Scheduled for July 10th

The following topics will be addressed during the conference:

1. Issues raised in cross-cutting motion letter briefs.
2. Outstanding disputed provisions in the ESI protocol and 502(d) order.
3. The court’s request for discovery special master candidates.
4. The status of the time and expense order.
5. The status of discovery.

The cross-cutting motion issue is one where the defendants almost always lose. Defendants want to focus on whether Ozempic and other glucagon-like peptide-1 drugs cause gastroparesis, ileus/intestinal obstruction, cholecystitis, and venous thromboembolism.

Plaintiffs are willing to look at this causation. However, they also want to get ready for trial.  The defendants’ path delays litigation by another year.

Defendants like to stall in these MDLs. They want to delay a potential Ozempic settlement for as long as they can. MDL judges universally reject this request to bifurcate discovery.

This issue has recently arisen in the Suboxone, Tepezza, Paragard, Uber sexual assault, hair relaxer, NEC formula, and social medial addiction MDLS. Judges reject this request every time.

July 3, 2024 – New Study Finds Association Between Ozempic and Vision Loss

A new study found an association between semaglutide and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a type of eye stroke that causes sudden vision loss. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, which includes Ozempic.

The researchers’ data comprised over 16,800 university hospital patients who were either managing their diabetes or weight. They compared semaglutide patients to those using other medications in a different drug class.

The researchers found that among type 2 diabetic patients, 8.9% of patients taking semaglutide had a significantly higher incidence of NAION compared to 1.8% of those on other diabetic medications.

For overweight or obese patients, the incidence was 6.7% for semaglutide users versus 0.8% for those on other weight-loss drugs. These numbers suggest a strong association between semaglutide and NAION.

This is a significant finding for both doctors and patients to consider when choosing treatment options.

July 1, 2024 – New Lawsuits Filed

Within a month, five new lawsuits were filed in this litigation. Four were filed this past June, while one was filed today. This brought the total to 106.

The lawsuit filed today involves an Indiana woman who took Ozempic to control both her diabetes and weight.

She was admitted to the emergency room on July 1, 2022, with severe constipation, rectal bleeding, and vomiting. An ultrasound revealed a bowel obstruction. The woman underwent treatment for this condition before being released. She continues to experience irregular bowel movements.

The Ozempic label failed to adequately warn her or her healthcare provider about its true risks. As a result, she claims her use of Ozempic has profoundly impacted her life.

June 23, 2024 – Kansas Resident Files Lawsuit Against Ozempic Manufacturer

A Kansas resident has filed a lawsuit against Ozempic’s manufacturer. They sought damages for severe health complications allegedly caused by the medication.

The plaintiff sued Ozempic from November 2019 to October 2022 for type 2 diabetes. They claimed the drug led to the development of gastroparesis. They also suffered from persistent vomiting, diarrhea, indigestion, bloating, abdominal pain, and significant emotional distress.

The lawsuit seeks compensation for the plaintiff’s suffering and incurred medical expenses.

June 10, 2024 – Philadelphia Judge Takes Over Ozempic Litigation

U.S. District Judge Karen Marston in Philadelphia is taking over litigation involving Ozempic and similar drugs. Marston was selected by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to manage product liability proceedings that are expected to cover over 10,000 personal injury lawsuits.

The case was previously overseen by the late U.S. District Judge Gene E.K. Pratter, who, as we discuss below, passed away suddenly in May due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Lawyers continue getting these cases ready. This includes developing a plaintiff fact sheet detailing individual injuries. A plaintiff fact sheet is a document used in mass tort litigation to provide detailed information about the plaintiff’s personal injuries, medical history, and other relevant facts.

This streamlines the discovery process by standardizing critical data collection from numerous plaintiffs involved in a large-scale lawsuit.

May 23, 2024 – Judge Overseeing MDL Tragically Passes Away

Some of the momentum to move this litigation forward has been stalled with the tragic death of the MDL judge, Gene E.K. Pratter, at age 75. (She seems to have lived a fantastic life.)

Now, the MDL Panel must find a new judge who will have to quickly become familiar with the litigation, which will take some time.

May 21, 2024 – Plaintiff and Defendant Attorneys Agree to Plaintiff Fact Sheet

The Ozempic plaintiffs’ committee filed a status report updating the MDL Judge on their progress with various “action items.”

According to that report, both sides in the litigation met last month in Rhode Island and are very close to agreement on a 13-page Plaintiff Fact Sheet (“PFS”) and authorization form that will be required from all plaintiffs moving forward.

The parties also agreed to use Rubris, a third-party vendor, to handle the electronic submission of the PFS and authorization forms.

April 16, 2024 – Plaintiff Attorneys Refute Defendants Claim Regarding Novel Ozempic Treatment

In a filing yesterday, the plaintiffs’ attorneys refuted the Defendants’ Position Statement, which claimed that the novel treatment approaches relieve them from certain legal responsibilities.

The filing emphasizes that Ozempic’s manufacturers are not exempt from the obligation to adequately warn of the drug’s severe risks.

The plaintiffs argue that these drugs’ widespread use only heightens the necessity to inform the public of these effects. They also criticize the drug labels for inadequately warning of potential severe injuries.

The filing points out that the lack of long-term studies puts the safety of these GLP-1RA drugs into question. The longest study of these drugs lasted two years. This situation is exacerbated by a significant portion of users discontinuing the drugs due to injuries or other factors.

Additional legal arguments revolve around establishing causation for the injuries claimed. The plaintiffs refute the defendants’ proposal to rely solely on a gastric emptying study for determining causation. They advocate for a differential diagnosis.

This method, supported by many physicians, evaluates all potential causes and excludes unlikely ones. It isolates the drug as a likely contributor to the condition.

The plaintiffs also oppose the defendants’ attempts to prematurely dismiss claims or limit the tests for proving causation to overly restrictive methods. They argue that such approaches do not adequately consider individual patient histories or the doctors’ clinical judgments, which are crucial for a fair trial.

This filing also critiques the defendants for understating the severity of potential drug-induced conditions like ileus and bowel obstruction. It argues that these conditions can be much more severe than the defendants acknowledge.

The filing concludes by underscoring the necessity of a fair and comprehensive discovery process to ensure all claims are adequately considered and adjudicated.

April 4, 2024 – Plaintiff Firms Clash Over Leadership Positions

There is a dispute among plaintiffs’ lawyers about who should be in the Ozempic lawyers’ leadership. Specifically, one firm wants a larger seat at the table. They have criticized the process for being unfair and non-transparent. This firm suggests it didn’t adequately consider all interested attorneys wanting to apply.

The good news is that the Ozempic lawyers in leadership are good attorneys who we expect to lead this litigation to a successful settlement for the victims.

March 15, 2024 – First Status Conference Held in Ozempic Lawsuit

The first status conference in the Ozempic class action lawsuit was held yesterday in Pennsylvania federal court. During the conference, attorneys for Novo Nordisk and plaintiffs alleged that the pharmaceutical company failed to adequately warn users about Ozempic and similar drugs’ side effects. It aimed to address organizational and procedural aspects of the case. This includes the plaintiffs’ leadership structure, motion practice, and the development of fact sheets.

The case involves allegations against GLP-1 receptor agonist medications. These claims surround issues like inadequate warning, design defects, and others. Most of the discussion focuses on organizing the plaintiffs’ representation to streamline the litigation process.

This includes appointing a leadership team that comprises a lead counsel, liaison counsel, an executive committee, and a steering committee. The court and the parties discussed the importance of setting up a process for filing motions, particularly motions to dismiss that would apply across potentially thousands of cases to make the litigation manageable.

Both sides express a willingness to work together on a process that allows for the efficient handling of these motions. They recognize that resolving key legal issues early on significantly impacts the case’s direction.

Another critical point of discussion at this conference was the development of plaintiff fact sheets. Both sides agreed that these fact sheets are crucial for exchanging information about the use of the drugs in question and the injuries alleged. Negotiations around these fact sheets are ongoing, with an emphasis on providing proof of drug use and injury to the defendants as quickly. Eighteen lawsuits have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Judge Gene E.K. Pratter is overseeing this MDL. An additional 37 lawsuits are pending consolidation.

Most of these are Ozempic lawsuits focused on the failure to warn of the risk of gastroparesis. This condition impairs stomach contractions and digestion, leading to severe symptoms like nausea and dehydration. This litigation also covers other glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists like Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Trulicity.

There is no case management order as of yet. Most court orders have been admitted out-of-state Ozempic lawyers on both sides to participate in the litigation.

February 29, 2024 – First Status Conference

The first status conference for the Ozempic MDL will be held on March 14, 2024. This will be the first chance to see how U.S. District Judge Gene E.K. Pratter will approach this litigation.

February 20, 2024 – Recent Study Finds Significant Association Between Ozempic and Psychiatric Side Effects

One of the recurring themes is that we do not know enough about these drugs. Here is a new example.

A recent study found a “significant association” between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists such as Ozempic, Mounjaro, and Wegovy and psychiatric side effects.

We will learn of more benefits and risk of these drugs as we go.  The important point is that you should know these things before the drug goes on the market.

February 8, 2024 – Research Reports on Ozempic’s Associations with Weight Loss and Gastrointestinal Issues

New research indicates that individuals using widely recognized GLP-1 receptor agonist medications, including Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro, experienced weight loss. However, many patients may encounter a heightened likelihood of experiencing gastrointestinal issues, including nausea, vomiting, and more.

The concern is particularly noted for higher doses of the drug. This suggests that the administration of Ozempic needs careful consideration regarding dosing to minimize side effects.

Interestingly, Mounjaro emerged as the most potent GLP-1RA in enhancing glycemic control by reducing hemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose levels.

February 5, 2024 – Ozempic Cases Consolidated in Philadelphia Federal Court

We have a new Ozempic class action lawsuit.

The MDL Panel has directed that federal lawsuits involving Ozempic and similar medications be consolidated under a federal judge in Philadelphia. Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly want to move the cases to alternative jurisdictions like North Carolina or California.

The Panel said no. They point out that a significant portion of these lawsuits, at least 13 out of 55, are already situated in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, close to Novo Nordisk’s headquarters in New Jersey.

Our Ozempic lawyers expect to see thousands of lawsuits in the next year. The core of every Ozempic lawsuit will be that these companies failed to adequately warn users about the risks of gastroparesis, a condition causing stomach paralysis. Yes, the drug labels mention gastrointestinal side effects. However, the labels significantly underplay the severity and risks of stomach issues.e companies that can quickly fund Ozempic settlement amounts and jury payouts. These entities are printing money selling Ozempic.

January 8, 2024 – Study Suggests No Association Between Ozempic and Suicide

A new 2024 study in the journal Nature contradicts an FDA report’s concerns about potential suicide risks associated with certain weight loss and diabetes medications. The FDA was concerned about cited 201 instances of suicide or suicidal ideation related to glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, including Ozempic and Mounjaro, in a quarter report.

This new study found no increased suicide risk in patients using these medications. In fact, it suggested that patients on these drugs were less likely to attempt suicide compared to obese patients not taking them.

I have no idea if these drugs cause suicide. However, this new study is encouraging. What I do know is that we know way too little about Ozempic and Mounjaro’s side effects.

January 6, 2024 – Defendants Disagree on Consolidation 

We have updates on the path to a Mounjaro and Ozempic class action lawsuit. Novo Nordisk (Ozempic) supports the consolidation. They cite the shared factual, scientific, and legal issues among the 41 suits filed in 17 federal courts.

Novo Nordisk suggests the Western District of Louisiana or the Southern District of California for the proceeding.

However, the defendants are not on the same page. Eli Lilly (Monunjaro) opposes being included in the combined litigation. They argue that most cases focus on Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic, particularly its use for weight loss.

Eli Lilly claims these Ozempic cases are not associated with their products, Mounjaro and Trulicity, which are approved for type 2 diabetes treatment, but not weight loss. Lilly also contends that only 10 cases involve its products. They propose that these 10 cases, if included, be sent to the Southern District of Indiana or the Middle District of North Carolina.

January 1, 2024 – Recent Ozempic Lawsuit in Louisiana

In a recent Ozempic lawsuit filed in Louisiana, a patient alleges their use of Ozempic and Mounjaro caused severe health issues, including extreme vomiting and tooth loss. The defendants, Novo Nordisk and its North American operations, contest the jurisdiction of the Louisiana court.

They argue that there is the lack of substantial connection between them and the state. Novo Nordisk claim that the lawsuit fails to establish their incorporation, principal business operations in Louisiana, or significant interactions with the state.

Furthermore, the lawsuit does not explicitly allege any targeted conduct by the companies toward Louisiana, nor does it detail the plaintiff’s prescription history, marketing exposure, or injury occurrence related to the state.

The case also involves U.S.-based subsidiaries of Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. The plaintiff seeks to consolidate federal cases involving these medications into one multidistrict litigation.

As we have been reporting, the JPML Panel will decide on this issue in January, although we think they will likely create an Ozempic class action lawsuit.

December 1, 2023 – Plaintiffs File Motion with MDL Panel

A motion was filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) by a group of plaintiffs. They seek to centralize all federal gastroparesis lawsuits related to Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and similar GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs.

The motion proposes that pretrial proceedings be consolidated under U.S. District Judge James D. Cain, Jr. in the Western District of Louisiana.

There are 18 cases pending across various U.S. District Courts. But that is just the beginning. These drugs are huge, and it is hard to imagine an MDL will not be created.

November 7, 2023 – Ozempic Class Action Lawsuit Filed in Canada

The Canadians are joining in now. Novo Nordisk is contending with a class action lawsuit in Canada over allegations that the pharmaceutical company did not provide sufficient warnings about the potential for gastroparesis caused by its drug Ozempic, a condition that, of course, mirrored lawsuits here.

October 6, 2023 – New Study Suggests that Ozempic Causes Gastrointestinal Problems

This new study will encourage many victims to file an Ozempic lawsuit in 2023. It was released in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The study’s data suggests that individuals using popular weight loss medications, like Ozempic or Wegovy, might be at high risk of developing severe gastrointestinal issues.

This is even more evidence of a potential association between weight loss drugs known as GLP-1 agonists and such stomach-related risks. The drugs in Ozempic and Wegovy contain semaglutide, while Saxenda contains liraglutide. Novo Nordisk produces both medications.

September 29, 2023 – FDA Updates Ozempic Label to Include Ileus Risk

Yesterday, the FDA updated the Ozempic label to include a cautionary note regarding a heightened risk of ileus. This condition obstructs the passage of food or fluid through the colon. Can we all agree that we do not know all the risks associated with Ozempic in 2023?

On September 28, 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated the Ozempic label to include a cautionary note regarding a heightened risk of ileus, a condition that obstructs the passage of food or fluid through the colon.

July 25, 2023 – New Evidence Reveals Association Between Gastrointestinal Problems and Ozempic

Newly released evidence reveals that using Ozempic or Wegovy for weight loss can cause severe gastrointestinal conditions, including gastroparesis (stomach paralysis) and cyclic vomiting syndrome.

Both conditions have been linked to prolonged use of Ozempic and Wegovy at the high doses commonly used for weight loss. These debilitating conditions can cause a severe and permanent impact on the patient’s life.

Ozempic

Ozempic (generically known as semaglutide) is a prescription medication that is used in the management of type 2 diabetes. Ozempic is part of a class of drugs known as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. GLP-1 is a hormone in the body that gets released in response to food intake and helps regulate blood sugar levels.

There is also evidence that Ozempic can induce weight loss in people with obesity, even those without diabetes. Ozempic is approved for the management of type-2 diabetes. Recently, however, doctors have prescribed Ozempic to treat obesity and weight management.

Ozempic is manufactured by the Dutch pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk, which focuses primarily on the development and sale of diabetes drugs.

Ozempic was first developed by Novo Nordisk in 2012, and it was approved for use by the FDA and released on the U.S. market in December 2017. In 2021, a higher-dose version of Ozempic (sold under the brand name Wegovy) was approved by the FDA.

Ozempic (and other GLP-1 drugs) work by stimulating the production of insulin after meals. GLP-1 is a naturally occurring peptide in the body that helps control blood sugar levels. GLP-1 agonists mimic the effects of this peptide, making them useful in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

So this drug helps to reduce blood sugar to normal levels. Ozempic also slows down the digestive process, which also helps to maintain normal glucose levels. Ozempic is administered as a once-weekly injection with a minimum dosage of 0.25 mg and a maximum dose of 1 mg.

Beyond its primary use for diabetes, the weight loss effects of Ozempic, observed during clinical trials, led to further exploration of the drug’s potential in this area. As a result, semaglutide has also been approved in higher doses under the name “Wegovy,” for chronic weight management.

How does Ozempic work? It works great. The drug is sweeping the country and it is helping many patients. The question is did the drug maker warn of all the risk so that a minority of patients did not unnecessary suffer?

Gastroparesis Is Awful

Gastroparesis is essentially a stomach condition where the muscles don’t work as they should. Normally, strong muscle movements help move food along the digestive system. But if you have gastroparesis, this movement in your stomach is either too slow or doesn’t happen at all, making it hard for your stomach to empty food correctly.

This can mess up your digestion and lead to several problems, like feeling nauseous, throwing up (sometimes even food that hasn’t been digested), belly pain, bloating, getting severely dehydrated, feeling full quickly when eating, food not digesting and staying in the stomach, acid reflux, blood sugar levels going up and down, not feeling hungry, losing weight, not getting enough nutrients, and a drop in your quality of life.

The news gets worse: there is no known cure for gastroparesis.

So, if you are reading this and you are not a victim, imagine the hunger pangs that prompt you to nourish your body, only to be met with pain, nausea, and vomiting every time you try to eat.

This condition traps its sufferers in a relentless cycle of discomfort. With a stomach that refuses to cooperate, the basic human need to eat becomes a battleground. Every meal is a calculation, a risk, and often a regret. The physical symptoms are just the beginning; the psychological toll is equally devastating. The constant worry about when the next flare-up will occur, the anxiety of eating in public, and the stress of managing a diet that is both safe and nourishing can be overwhelming. It is miserable.

The pain and discomfort of gastroparesis are not fleeting, either. They linger and echo through every aspect of your life, casting a shadow over daily activities and social interactions. The chronic nature of the condition means that relief is often temporary and incomplete, leaving sufferers to navigate a maze of treatments and dietary adjustments in search of some semblance of normalcy.

Cholecystitis is Awful, Too

Cholecystitis, or inflammation of the gallbladder, is usually caused by blockage of the tube leading out of the gallbladder. It is a serious condition that must be treated immediately to avoid potentially fatal complications. The most common treatment for cholecystitis is removal of the gallbladder.

Gallstones (cholelithiasis) are hard deposits that develop inside the gallbladder. They can get as big as a gold ball in some cases. Gallstones are categorized into two different types: cholesterol stones and pigment stones. Cholesterol stones are more common and comprised of excess cholesterol. Pigment stones are formed from bilirubin, a byproduct of the breakdown of red blood cells in the liver.

Estimated Settlement Amounts for an Ozempic Lawsuit

Estimating the potential settlement value of new product liability cases like this is almost impossible to do with any real accuracy. That is particularly true with the Ozempic gastroparesis lawsuits because they are very new. At this point, we don’t know how the scientific evidence behind these cases is going to hold up in court. That is a major variable in any defective drug case.

Still, victims want to know how much the Ozempic lawsuit is going to payout? So what our lawyers can do, however, is provide an educated guess as to the possible settlement compensation payout range of Ozempic cases based on various assumptions about the causation evidence. Based on these significant assumptions, our attorneys believe that a successful Ozempic lawsuit could have a settlement value range of $400,000 to $700,000. This is the settlement value estimate for the “top tier” Ozempic cases, which would be those in which the plaintiff suffered severe gastroparesis or death.

In our April 5, 2024 update above, our attorneys talk about the type of cases we are seeing in this litigation. Some of them involve injuries that resolve quickly. You will not see settlement payouts anywhere near that number for those types of lawsuits. But serious permanent injury cases may see real value.

Practical Reasons That May Drive an Ozempic Settlement

The financial dynamics of the pharmaceutical market suggest significant potential payouts in the Ozempic-related litigation. These defendants are getting ridiculous profits from Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy, Trulicity, and Mounjaro. These companies  are in a position to handle extensive settlement costs without crippling their financial standing.

Drug companies typically like to fight and drag out litigation as long as possible.  They also do not care as much as you would think about besmirching the name of the company with adverse publicity of big verdicts against them. But this is different – they are worried about the drug’s reputation and their ability to sell more of it.

It is the profits these drugs are bringing in may change the calculus.  It may make it more likely that these companies will prefer settling claims out of court more quickly to protect their profits and avoid the public relations disaster of a verdict and the additional scrutiny on these drugs adverse verdicts could bring.

The thinking is that these defendants might opt to offer substantial settlement payouts to quickly resolve the litigation and mitigate any negative publicity that could arise during a trial. Such a strategy not only helps maintain the brand’s market position but also potentially avoids the exposure of additional harmful evidence that could lead to even higher compensation claims or punitive damages.

So the expectation hope is that defendants will issue significant compensation to claimants sooner rather than later to circumvent the reputational damage and financial unpredictability associated with jury verdicts.

Weight Loss Lawsuits May Have Higher Values than for Diabetes

On September 28, 2023, the FDA added a new warning to the Ozempic label about the potential for increased risk of ileus, a blockage that keeps food or liquid from passing through the colon.

The new warning on the Ozempic label states that:

Ileus: Ileus is a serious but rare side effect that has been reported in patients taking Ozempic. Ileus can cause abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and constipation. If you experience any of these symptoms, contact your healthcare provider immediately.

The FDA also recommends that healthcare providers monitor patients taking Ozempic for signs and symptoms of ileus, and that they consider discontinuing Ozempic if ileus is suspected.

The point being underscored here is that we have a drug on the market, but the risks of the drug are far from nailed down.

The Focus of Every Ozempic Lawsuit Is the Failure to Warn

Every Ozempic lawsuit asserts the key claim in this litigation:  Novo Nordisk, the maker of Ozempic, failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of developing gastroparesis, a condition characterized by delayed stomach emptying, as a side effect of the drug.

While the Ozempic label mentions common adverse reactions like nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and constipation, it does not link these symptoms to gastroparesis nor does it include them in the “Warnings and Precautions” section. The label does mention delayed gastric emptying in the context of drug interactions and describes a minor delay in gastric emptying as part of the drug’s mechanism, but it does not explicitly state gastroparesis as a risk or potential chronic condition resulting from Ozempic use.

Victims’ Ozempic lawyers argue that Novo Nordisk was aware or should have been aware of the potential link between Ozempic and gastroparesis, based on clinical studies, case reports, and medical literature. That is the core of these lawsuits. The company failed to provide adequate warnings about this risk, which allegedly led to a lack of awareness in the medical community and potentially affected prescribing decisions.

You also have to remember that we are not just talking about Ozempic in terms of clues to the risk. Ozempic is a  GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). The risk of gastroparesis is common across the GLP-1RA class, which includes medications like tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide. Published literature on the association between gastroparesis and any GLP-1RA, not just Ozempic, should have alerted manufacturers to the need for warnings about this risk to patients and prescribing physicians.

Ozempic lawsuits contend that if the risks of gastroparesis had been adequately disclosed, it would have influenced the physician’s decision to prescribe Ozempic or to monitor for symptoms of gastroparesis more closely. Why not disclose the risk? There could be any number of reasons. But, like everything, it usually comes down to money. More warnings equals less sales, which equals less money. It is as simple as that.

Ozempic Class Action Lawsuit

In February 2024, the MDL panel certified an Ozempic class action lawsuit. A Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) class action can potentially speed up the settlement process in lawsuits like the Ozempic case in two important way that may lead to earlier Ozempic settlements:

1. Streamlined Proceedings: MDLs consolidate similar cases to streamline the legal process. By bringing numerous similar lawsuits under one court, MDLs help reduce duplicative discovery, avoid conflicting rulings in different courts, and increase the efficiency of the legal process. This consolidation can lead to quicker settlements because it creates pressure on the defendants to resolve many cases at once rather than dealing with each case individually over a prolonged period.
2. Higher Negotiation Leverage: In an MDL, the large number of cases consolidated together increases the plaintiffs’ negotiation leverage. This can encourage the defendant, in this case, Novo Nordisk, to settle to avoid the risk of facing a potentially large, cumulative judgment across many individual cases. Settlements in an MDL can offer compensation to claimants more quickly than individual lawsuits, which might take years to resolve. Ozempic settlement amounts are unlikely to be one-size-fits-all. If these claims are successful, Ozempic settlement payouts will vary depending on the severity of the side effects and the evidence supporting the plaintiffs’ claims.

Our lawyers sometimes refer to the Ozempic MDL (multidistrict litigation) as a class action lawsuit because that is what people call it (and, frankly, how they search it), but it is important to understand that these two legal mechanisms are distinct.

A class action lawsuit involves a group of plaintiffs who have suffered similar harm from the same defendant, and their cases are combined into a single lawsuit. This allows the group to be represented collectively by a member of the class, and any judgment or settlement applies to all class members. In a class action, the court must certify the class, establishing that the claims are sufficiently similar and that the representative parties will protect the interests of the class. You might see some classic Ozempic class actions filed in this litigation that includes consumer claims for people that may not be injured.

On the other hand, an MDL consolidates individual Ozempic lawsuits with similar claims into one court for pretrial proceedings to streamline the process and make it more efficient. Each plaintiff in an MDL maintains their individual lawsuit, and their case is transferred back to its original court for trial if it does not settle during the MDL process. The primary goal of an MDL is to handle complex cases involving many plaintiffs and common factual issues more efficiently.

In the context of the Ozempic MDL, multiple individual cases related to the drug are consolidated for pretrial procedures. This allows for coordinated discovery and judicial efficiency but retains the individuality of each plaintiff’s claim. Unlike a class action, the outcomes in an MDL can vary for each plaintiff based on the specifics of their case.

Estimated Settlement Amounts for an Ozempic Lawsuit

Estimating the potential settlement value of new product liability cases like this is almost impossible to do with any real accuracy. That is particularly true with the Ozempic gastroparesis lawsuits because they are very new. At this point, we don’t know how the scientific evidence behind these cases is going to hold up in court. That is a major variable in any defective drug case.

Still, victims want to know how much the Ozempic lawsuit is going to payout? So what our lawyers can do, however, is provide an educated guess as to the possible settlement compensation payout range of Ozempic cases based on various assumptions about the causation evidence. Based on these significant assumptions, our attorneys believe that a successful Ozempic lawsuit could have a settlement value range of $400,000 to $700,000. This is the settlement value estimate for the “top tier” Ozempic cases, which would be those in which the plaintiff suffered severe gastroparesis or death.

Some involve injuries that these drugs cause heal relatively quickly, and those cases will likely not see settlement payouts close to the larger figures. However, cases involving severe and permanent injuries may have significant value.

Practical Reasons That May Drive Settlement

The financial dynamics of the pharmaceutical market suggest significant potential payouts in the Ozempic-related litigation. These defendants are getting ridiculous profits from Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy, Trulicity, and Mounjaro. These companies  are in a position to handle extensive settlement costs without crippling their financial standing.

Drug companies typically like to fight and drag out litigation as long as possible.  They also do not care as much as you would think about besmirching the name of the company with adverse publicity of big verdicts against them. But this is different – they are worried about the drug’s reputation and their ability to sell more of it.

It is the profits these drugs are bringing in may change the calculus.  It may make it more likely that these companies will prefer settling claims out of court more quickly to protect their profits and avoid the public relations disaster of a verdict and the additional scrutiny on these drugs adverse verdicts could bring.

The thinking is that these defendants might opt to offer substantial settlement payouts to quickly resolve the litigation and mitigate any negative publicity that could arise during a trial. Such a strategy not only helps maintain the brand’s market position but also potentially avoids the exposure of additional harmful evidence that could lead to even higher compensation claims or punitive damages.

So the expectation hope is that defendants will issue significant compensation to claimants sooner rather than later to circumvent the reputational damage and financial unpredictability associated with jury verdicts.

Weight Loss Lawsuits May Have Higher Values than for Diabetes

Hiring an Ozempic Lawyer

If you have an Ozempic gastroparesis lawsuit, call our Ozempic lawsuit lawyers today at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online for a free consultation.