United States of America

Our lawyers are investigating gambling addiction lawsuits involving DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, ESPN Bet, Bet365, Fanatics Sportsbook, Hard Rock Bet, and other online betting platforms. The core allegation is that these companies had the data to see compulsive gambling behavior and, instead of slowing users down, kept pushing them with bonus bets, deposit matches, push notifications, VIP hosts, profit boosts, same game parlays, microbets, and personalized offers.

If you or your child suffered serious harm from online sports betting addiction, the first question is not whether gambling was legal. The first question is whether the platform used design, data, and marketing to keep a vulnerable user betting when a responsible operator should have stepped in.

If you or someone you love has suffered severe financial and emotional harm because of addiction to online gambling or sports betting, contact our lawyers at 800-553-8082 or get a free, no-obligation online consultation.

Our lawyers are handling AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits around the country.

This page provides the most recent news and updates on the AFFF firefighting foam class action lawsuit and our prediction of the settlement amounts that plaintiffs with AFFF cancer lawsuits can expect to receive. You will not get more updated news on the AFFF litigation anywhere else.

Our AFFF firefighting foam lawyers believe the defendants will settle most of these lawsuits this year (2026) before a single trial.  Why? They will follow the same pattern as the water contamination lawsuits they settled for billions of dollars.  In those cases, we saw the defendants’ apparent preference for settlement over the uncertainties of a trial.  This makes sense; the AFFF lawsuits are strong cases.

Our lawyers are handling Taxotere eye injury lawsuits throughout the United States for women with permanently watery eyes from docetaxel.

Taxotere (docetaxel) is a widely used breast cancer chemotherapy drug. New evidence has emerged showing that Taxotere may be causing some users to suffer permanent vision loss or damage.

This has led to a wave of product liability Taxotere lawsuits by women who claim that Taxotere damaged their eyesight. The manufacturer of Taxotere, Sanofi, allegedly knew about the risk of vision damage but chose not to warn doctors or patients about this risk.

If you were the victim of sexual abuse or assault, either as a child or an adult, you have the right to bring a civil lawsuit against both your abuser and any school, company, or organization that might be liable for the abuse.

In this post, we will take a look at sex abuse lawsuits in Connecticut. We will look at the law in Connecticut relevant to sex abuse cases, such as the statute of limitations.

We will also discuss the potential settlement amount victims see in these cases. If you have a Connecticut sex abuse lawsuit you may want to bring, contact us today for a free consultation at 800-553-8082.

Victims of sexual abuse or sexual assault are bringing civil lawsuits in California and getting significant settlements. Thanks to new changes in California law, it is now much easier for sex abuse victims to access the civil courts.

In this post, we will examine the process and laws related to sex abuse lawsuits in California. We will also examine the average settlement amounts of these cases and provide examples of settlements and jury payouts.

If you have a sex abuse case in California, contact us today online or call 800-553-8082.

Maryland workers’ compensation law provides compensation and medical benefits for workplace injuries. Our lawyers fight to help injured workers recover as much as Maryland law will allow. Our Baltimore workers’ comp lawyers handle claims throughout Maryland. If you do not live close to Baltimore, you do not need to travel to our law firm.

Workers’ compensation is supposed to be straightforward. You get hurt at work. You report the injury. You get medical care. You receive wage benefits if you cannot work. But anyone who has dealt with a real workers’ comp claim knows the system can turn ugly fast. The insurance company may deny the claim, argue your injury is preexisting, refuse to authorize treatment, send you to an independent medical evaluation, or push you back to work before you are physically ready.

Except in certain limited instances, these benefits are the “exclusive remedy” available to injured workers. This means victims of workplace injuries usually cannot file a civil lawsuit against their employer for their injuries. But they can file a civil lawsuit against other parties responsible for their injuries.

Dupixent lawsuits are now moving forward in federal court for patients who allege the drug caused, accelerated, or unmasked cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and related T-cell lymphomas. On June 4, 2026, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized the federal Dupixent cases in MDL No. 3180, In re: Dupixent (Dupilumab) Products Liability Litigation, in the District of New Jersey before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi.

Dupixent, also known as dupilumab, is a biologic medication used to treat atopic dermatitis, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, eosinophilic esophagitis, prurigo nodularis, COPD, bullous pemphigoid, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and other inflammatory conditions. For many patients, Dupixent has provided real relief where other treatments failed. But for some patients, the story has been very different.

The lawsuits allege that Regeneron and Sanofi failed to warn doctors and patients that cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, often called CTCL, can mimic eczema and that Dupixent may mask, accelerate, or delay diagnosis of an underlying lymphoma. Plaintiffs argue that patients with adult-onset, atypical, or treatment-resistant dermatitis should have been warned to rule out lymphoma before starting Dupixent and to stop and investigate if symptoms worsened or changed during treatment.

Our lawyers handle Paraquat lawsuits in all 50 states. This page provides the latest news and updates on Paraquat lawsuits in both state and federal courts. We also give our perspective on where this litigation is heading and provide projected settlement payouts for a viable Paraquat lawsuit. Continue reading

Our lawyers are reviewing Rhode Island child sexual abuse lawsuits against the Roman Catholic Church, including claims involving the Diocese of Providence, Catholic parishes, Catholic schools, religious orders, priests, deacons, brothers, nuns, parish workers, and other Church-connected adults.

These claims are not just about what an individual abuser did. The real question is whether the Diocese, a parish, a school, a religious order, or Church leadership knew enough to stop the abuse, warn families, remove the abuser, report to police, or protect children, and failed to do so.

Rhode Island has now opened a two-year revival window for Rhode Island childhood sexual abuse claims that were previously blocked by old filing deadlines. This is a major development for survivors of Catholic clergy abuse in Rhode Island. The window was opened after years of survivor advocacy, the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision in Houllahan v. Gelineau, and the 2026 Rhode Island Attorney General report on the Diocese of Providence.

Contact Information