United States of America

Uber is defending thousands of sexual assault lawsuits brought by passengers who say they were sexually assaulted by Uber drivers. Plaintiffs are asking what Uber knew about the risk of sexual assault, how it screened drivers, what happened when complaints came in, and whether the company could have done more to keep dangerous drivers off the platform. In the $8.5 million verdict, jurors confirmed what we have been saying all along.

Federal cases have been consolidated in In re: Uber Technologies Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, MDL No. 3084, in the Northern District of California. In an MDL, each survivor still has her own lawsuit and her own damages.

By October 2026, 4,916 cases were pending in the federal MDL, with additional claims proceeding in California state court. A federal bellwether case scheduled for October was settled before opening statements. We expect another trial to be scheduled soon.

Bard PowerPort lawsuits allege that defects in implanted port catheters can cause fractures, migration, blood clots, infections, embolisms, and other serious complications. Thousands of product liability lawsuits are now pending against Bard and its parent company, Becton Dickinson, in a federal multidistrict litigation in Arizona.  After a long slog, these cases are now moving forward.

The first bellwether trial ended with a partial defense verdict and a deadlocked jury on the central design defect claim. The most recent trial, Divelbliss v. C.R. Bard, led to a $40 million verdict. It involved an alleged fracture of a silicone Groshong catheter. Five bellwether trials are now expected to run through February 2027.  So far, we are 1-1, with the third trial now getting underway. Our lawyers remain bullish on well-documented fracture, migration, and embolization cases.

This page provides the latest Bard PowerPort lawsuit updates, projected settlement amounts, and information about who may qualify to file a claim.

Our law firm is handling baby food autism lawsuits in all 50 states.

Several popular brands of baby food contain high levels of heavy metals such as mercury, arsenic, lead, and cadmium. These heavy metals are well-known neurotoxins. Thousands of children may have developed autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders due to toxic metals found in baby foods.

A growing number of parents are pursuing a toxic baby food lawsuit to hold manufacturers accountable for their children’s exposure to harmful contaminants. These baby food autism lawsuits allege the manufacturers knew about heavy metals in their products, and children developed autism from consuming them. 

Victims of sexual abuse or sexual assault in Pennsylvania may have the right to file civil lawsuits and seek financial compensation. Our lawyers handle claims against institutions that failed to protect the people in their care, including schools, churches, juvenile detention centers, and residential treatment facilities.

Our lawyers explain the process of filing sex abuse lawsuits in Pennsylvania, including the statute of limitations, potential settlement compensation, and recent verdicts and settlements. If the abuse happened years ago, do not assume that alone prevents you from bringing a claim. The deadline depends on your circumstances and which version of the law applies.

If you are a victim of sexual abuse and want to file a sex abuse lawsuit, we can help you. Contact us today at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online.

Survivors of sexual abuse at Orange County Juvenile Hall in California may be able to file individual civil lawsuits, seek permission to proceed anonymously, and pursue settlement compensation. This page explains how these cases work, expected settlement amounts, filing deadlines, and what evidence moves the needle with the County and its insurers.

You do not need to obtain your juvenile records before speaking with a lawyer. If you have a potential sex abuse lawsuit involving Orange County Juvenile Hall, call our California sex abuse lawyers at 800-553-8082 or get a free confidential consultation.

Our firm’s age cutoff is not the legal deadline. Our firm uses an age 40 cutoff when accepting these cases. That intake policy excludes some survivors who still have a viable claim. If your age places you outside our cutoff, speak promptly with another California sexual abuse attorney rather than assuming you have no case.

Victims of sexual abuse or sexual assault in Texas can file civil lawsuits against their abuser and other third parties, such as schools, churches, etc. Our sex abuse lawyers help victims get financial compensation by filing civil lawsuits against parties who negligently allowed the abuse to occur or failed to prevent it.

This page looks at the process of filing a civil lawsuit for sexual abuse in Texas and the laws governing these claims.

We also look at the relevant laws regarding sex abuse and the average settlement value of these cases.

Being sent to a juvenile detention center did not give anyone the right to sexually abuse you. New York juvenile detention sex abuse lawsuits seek to hold staff members and the institutions responsible for sexual abuse committed in custody accountable. Filing a lawsuit can help victims obtain financial compensation for therapy, medical expenses, and the lasting harm the abuse caused.

You may have a claim even if you never reported the abuse, the facility has closed, or you cannot remember the employee’s full name. The first questions are where you were held, approximately when it happened, and your age at the time. Those answers help our lawyers identify the facility, the responsible parties, and the filing rules that apply.

If you have a potential New York juvenile detention center sex abuse lawsuit, call us today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online for a free, confidential case evaluation.

Breast mesh lawsuits allege that some manufacturers promoted or allowed their mesh products to become widely used in breast reconstruction, augmentation, and revision procedures despite the fact that FDA has not cleared or approved any surgical mesh product for use in breast surgery. The FDA has specifically stated that the safety and effectiveness of surgical mesh in breast surgery, including augmentation and reconstruction, has not been determined.

These internal bra lawsuits allege that manufacturers of products such as AlloDerm, GalaFLEX, Phasix, AlloMax, FlexHD, Strattice, and DuroSorb marketed their devices for breast reconstruction, augmentation, and revision surgeries even though those breast-specific applications had not been adequately studied or cleared by the FDA. Patients were not warned. Surgeons were not given enough information. So when complications developed, including infection, mesh failure, chronic pain, implant loss, breast deformity, and the need for additional surgery, many women had no reason to connect their injuries to the mesh product placed inside them.

Chlorpyrifos lawsuits allege that repeated exposure to this widely used insecticide can contribute to Parkinson’s disease. The people most likely to bring these claims are farmers, pesticide applicators, pest control workers, groundskeepers, greenhouse employees, and others who personally mixed, loaded, sprayed, or cleaned up chlorpyrifos products over months or years.

Chlorpyrifos was sold under trade names that include Dursban, Lorsban, Cobalt, Nufos, Bolton, Stallion, Pilot, Warhawk, and Hatchet. It was used on farms, golf courses, ornamental plants, and residential and commercial properties. Many workers remember the trade name but not the active ingredient. Product identification is therefore one of the first and most important parts of investigating a claim.

Quick answers

The California Institution for Women, called CIW, is the state’s oldest women’s prison and one of its most troubled. Located in the Chino area of San Bernardino County and operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CIW has long been associated with overcrowding, inadequate medical care, and repeated allegations of sexual abuse by staff.

This page will look at civil lawsuits for sexual abuse of female prisoners at the California Institution for Women in Chino. Inmates at CIW have been subjected to alleged sexual abuse at the hands of correctional officers through threats and coercion. Many inmates have also alleged sexual abuse by the prison OB-GYN during medical exams.

In recent years, former inmates have come forward describing sexual assault by correctional officers and predatory conduct during medical exams, including CIW’s longtime OB-GYN, Dr. Scott Lee. Those revelations have led to civil sexual assault lawsuits, a federal investigation, and renewed scrutiny of how California prisons protect the women in their custody.

Contact Information