United States of America

Hand, wrist, and finger injuries are often undervalued by insurance companies because the injured body part is small. That is a mistake. A serious hand injury can change how you work, drive, cook, write, type, lift, dress, bathe, hold tools, or care for your family.

This page explains settlement amounts for hand, wrist, and finger injuries caused by car accidents, falls, dog bites, unsafe property conditions, defective products, and other acts of negligence. We also examine reported verdicts and settlements to show what pushes these claims up or down in value.

A dominant-hand injury can carry greater value when it permanently limits writing, gripping, typing, lifting, tool use, or employment. But dominance is only one factor. The diagnosis, surgery, permanence, occupation, lost income, insurance coverage, and strength of the liability evidence usually have a greater effect on the final settlement.

This page provides updates on Camp Lejeune lawsuits. Our lawyers are still working to give the latest update on the litigation, even though we are no longer taking new cases. Why? Because there is little information out there, and we are staying with victims, including those we do not represent, until the end.

We have also recently reopened the comments below to answer any questions you may have or simply give you a chance to share your thoughts.

Latest Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Updates for 2026

Victims of sexual abuse or sexual assault are bringing civil lawsuits in California and getting significant settlements. Thanks to new changes in California law, it is now much easier for sex abuse victims to access the civil courts.

In this post, we will examine the process and laws related to sex abuse lawsuits in California. We will also examine the average settlement amounts of these cases and provide examples of settlements and jury payouts.

If you have a sex abuse case in California, contact us today online or call 800-553-8082.

Tylenol autism lawsuits are being filed nationwide with a new Tylenol Autism class action lawsuit – technically an MDL, as we explain below – now certified in federal court.

Another Path For Victims – Baby Food

There may be another path to compensation for some victims.  Plaintiffs’ Tylenol lawyers are exploring options in state court (and looking at potential baby food lawsuits for children with autism.. Those lawsuits are gaining new currency after the Tylenol cases faltered in the MDL.

Dry shampoo lawsuits alleged that aerosol products sold under the Batiste, Sun Bum, and Paul Mitchell names contained benzene that consumers never expected to find in a hair product. The lawsuits followed laboratory testing that detected benzene in specific batches of dry shampoo from dozens of brands.

The largest public resolution was a settlement involving Batiste manufacturer Church & Dwight. That settlement is finished. It provided a $2.5 million cash fund and up to $600,000 in product vouchers, which explains why you may see it described as either a $2.5 million or $3.1 million deal. Those are two ways of describing different parts of the same settlement.

If you bought Batiste dry shampoo but did not file a claim by the 2023 deadline, you are too late to collect from that settlement. The individual payments were picayune anyway. People without proof of purchase could receive up to $10, while consumers with receipts could seek reimbursement subject to the settlement terms.

Women are still filing vaginal mesh lawsuits and bladder sling lawsuits in 2026, but this is no longer the enormous federal mass tort it was a decade ago. The old federal MDLs have closed. Most legacy claims have been resolved, and the remaining litigation is concentrated in individual cases and state-court dockets, including active Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon pelvic mesh cases in New Jersey.

A viable case now depends less on the history of the old litigation and more on specific proof: the manufacturer and product, the date of implantation, mesh erosion or another documented complication, revision surgery, and medical evidence connecting the implant to the injury. Our lawyers are currently focused on selected claims involving Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon and Coloplast products. We are not accepting new Boston Scientific mesh claims.

This page provides our latest transvaginal mesh lawsuit update, explains bladder sling complications lawsuits, discusses settlement value, and answers whether it may still be possible to file. Call 800-553-8082 or contact us online for a free case review.

Dupixent lawsuits are now moving forward in federal court for patients who allege the drug caused, accelerated, or unmasked cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and related T-cell lymphomas. On June 4, 2026, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized the federal Dupixent cases in MDL No. 3180, In re: Dupixent (Dupilumab) Products Liability Litigation, in the District of New Jersey before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi.

Dupixent, also known as dupilumab, is a biologic medication used to treat atopic dermatitis, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, eosinophilic esophagitis, prurigo nodularis, COPD, bullous pemphigoid, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and other inflammatory conditions. For many patients, Dupixent has provided real relief where other treatments failed. But for some patients, the story has been very different.

The lawsuits allege that Regeneron and Sanofi failed to warn doctors and patients that cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, often called CTCL, can mimic eczema and that Dupixent may mask, accelerate, or delay diagnosis of an underlying lymphoma. Plaintiffs argue that patients with adult-onset, atypical, or treatment-resistant dermatitis should have been warned to rule out lymphoma before starting Dupixent and to stop and investigate if symptoms worsened or changed during treatment.

Glucose monitor lawsuits are being filed by people who say continuous glucose monitoring systems failed when they needed them most. These lawsuits involve Dexcom G6, Dexcom G7, Abbott FreeStyle Libre 3, and Abbott FreeStyle Libre 3 Plus sensors, apps, and receivers that allegedly provided inaccurate glucose readings, missed high- or low-glucose alerts, failed early, or failed to warn users that glucose data had stopped reporting.

This is no small complaint for someone with diabetes who relies on these monitors. A continuous glucose monitor can drive decisions about insulin, food, sleep, exercise, and emergency care. When a sensor falsely reports low glucose, a patient may eat carbohydrates or delay insulin. When a device misses a low alert, a patient may seize, lose consciousness, fall, or die. When a high glucose event is missed, the result can be prolonged hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, hospitalization, or worse.  Of course, a malfunctioning glucose monitor typically causes more minor injuries and inconveniences.

Our lawyers are looking for serious glucose monitor cases involving serious injury or death.

This page is about social media addiction lawsuits and who is eligible to bring a claim. Our lawyers also provide the latest news on social media class action lawsuits (including the ongoing trial in California).

The problem that led to social media lawsuits is that millions of people, too many of whom are children, are addicted to social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and others. For these vulnerable users, social media addiction can be very harmful and lead to things like eating disorders, depression, and, in some cases, suicide.

Now, these companies are facing a wave of new social media lawsuits alleging that they knowingly designed the algorithms of their platforms to lure young people into harmful addictions.

Contact Information