Lawsuit Information Center

May 18, 2024

Indiana Personal Injury Law

This page looks at settlement amounts and jury payouts in personal injury cases in Indiana. Our lawyers also provide an analysis of Indiana personal injury law.

If you are a personal injury victim bringing a compensation claim in Indiana is only natural to want to know how much your case might be worth. Monetary compensation is what a personal injury or wrongful death case is ultimately about.

This page is designed to look at how personal injury cases have been resolved in Indiana and to give you the ability to match your claim with Indiana personal injury settlement statistics and example settlements and jury payouts.

May 15, 2024

Pennsylvania Juvenile Detention Center Sex Abuse Lawsuits

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

For years, the Delaware County Juvenile Detention Center (DCJDC) and similar juvenile facilities throughout Pennsylvania have come under intense scrutiny for their inability to safeguard young inmates from violence and sexual abuse. Numerous facilities have been the target of extensive state investigations, faced high-profile lawsuits, and reached substantial settlements, all alleging that facilities allowed juvenile inmates to be regularly sexually abused and mistreated.

Now, an increasing number of survivors are coming forward to pursue civil lawsuits against both private and public entities responsible for operating these detention centers, alleging their failure to fulfill their duty of care.

Pennsylvania Sex Abuse Lawsuits and Settlements

May 15, 2024

Missing Witness Rule in Maryland

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Testimony from a critical witness can often make or break a tort case at trial. But sometimes, the witness testimony the jury never hears can be even more critical in shaping the outcome. This leads to frequent battles over absentee witnesses.

The “missing witness” rule in Maryland, also known as the “failure to call a witness” rule, is a legal principle that allows a party to make an argument or inference in a trial based on the failure of the opposing party to call a witness who might know essential facts relevant to the case. This rule – although technically not a rule – is designed to address situations where a party possesses evidence that could be helpful to their case but does not present that evidence at trial.

The origins of the missing witness rule can be traced back to early English common law, where courts inferred that the absence of a witness implied the testimony would be unfavorable to the party failing to present the witness. This rule was rooted in the principle of fairness and the adversarial nature of legal proceedings, aiming to prevent parties from withholding evidence that could potentially alter the outcome of a trial.

May 15, 2024

Sex Abuse Lawsuits Against Illinois Youth Center Harrisburg

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page will look at civil lawsuits involving the sexual abuse of juvenile inmates at the Illinois Youth Center Harrisburg (IYC Harrisburg). IYC Harrisburg was the scene of widespread inmate abuse and mistreatment, including sexual abuse of juvenile inmates by the staff members who were supposed to be protecting them. The Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice had a legal obligation to protect juvenile detainees at IYC Harrisburg (and other IYC facilities) but negligently enabled the abuse of inmates at Harrisburg to occur. Civil lawsuits are now being brought by former inmates who were the victims of abuse.

If you have a potential sex abuse lawsuit against IYC Harrisburg our Illinois sex abuse lawyers today at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation. Our attorneys will fight to get you the overdue compensation that you deserve.

Dog Bite Injury Cases

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

According to the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), there are approximately 4.5 million dog bites annually in the United States. Approximately 800,000 of these bites require medical attention. There are about 40 dog bite fatalities a year in the US.

Being bitten by a dog can result in severe and traumatic injuries. A dog bite lawyer can assist in receiving compensation for damages caused by the injury. Here are some reasons to hire a dog bite lawyer, what to look for in a lawyer, steps to take after a dog bite, and types of damages that can be recovered.

RELATED CONTENT:

May 12, 2024

Washington DC Medical Malpractice Lawsuits and Verdicts

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

On this page, our lawyers will look at medical malpractice lawsuits in Washington DC. We provide an overview of the applicable DC law relevant to medical malpractice; the most common types of malpractice claims brought in DC; and how medical malpractice cases are generally resolved in the DC judicial system.

Washington, D.C. is a very unique jurisdiction. Unlike traditional states, it boasts its own distinct territory complete with revenues, elected representatives, and legal statutes. What sets D.C. apart is its status as a singular city, spanning 68 square miles and home to 700,000 residents, while simultaneously serving as the nation’s capital. These dual characteristics shape every aspect of Washington, D.C., from its governance to its legal framework concerning personal injury and civil justice.

Healthcare Professionals and Doctors in DC

May 11, 2024

South Dakota Personal Injury Verdicts and Settlements

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

In South Dakota, personal injury law governs a diverse array of legal disputes that arise from incidents causing physical injury, emotional distress, or other damages. These could include automobile accidents, slip and falls, medical malpractice, and more.

Understanding potential settlement payouts and jury awards in personal injury cases is crucial. The compensation a plaintiff might receive in South Dakota depends on various factors such as the severity of the injuries sustained, the degree of fault or negligence involved, and the unique circumstances of the case.

This page delves into personal injury law in South Dakota, including the state’s laws and regulations, such as the statute of limitations, and looks at recent cases to provide examples of typical settlement amounts and jury payout in South Dakota.

May 10, 2024

Stroke Malpractice Settlement Amounts and Jury Payouts

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page looks at settlement compensation and jury payouts in stroke malpractice lawsuits. We begin with how these cases work and the types of stroke malpractice lawsuits that tend to be successful. Then, our lawyer looks at example jury payout and settlement amounts in a stroke malpractice lawsuit Finally, drill down on what drives compensation awards in these lawsuits and settlements to give you some insight into the potential value of a stroke malpractice lawsuit.

Four Basic Types of Stroke Malpractice Lawsuits

stroke malpractice lawsuits are legal cases where a patient or their family sues a healthcare provider, like a doctor or a hospital, because they believe there was negligence in diagnosing or treating a stroke. A stroke, as you know if you are reading this, is a medical emergency where blood flow to the brain is interrupted. There are lots of battleground issues in stroke cases. But we will all agree that quick treatment is crucial to minimize damage.

May 10, 2024

Illinois Personal Injury Verdicts and Settlements

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

This page examines settlement amounts and jury awards in personal injury cases in Illinois. Our attorneys also offer an analysis of Illinois personal injury law.

As a personal injury victim pursuing a compensation claim in Illinois, it’s natural to want to understand the potential range of settlement payouts. After all, monetary compensation is ultimately the goal of a personal injury or wrongful death claim.

This page aims to explore how personal injury cases have been resolved in Illinois, allowing you to compare your claim with Illinois personal injury settlement statistics and examples of settlements and jury awards.

May 8, 2024

AGGA Appliance Lawsuit

by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

There is a new lawsuit involving the promotion and use of a dental device known as the Anterior Growth Guidance Appliance (AGGA). The lawsuit contends that the AGGA, which was marketed as a non-surgical solution for correcting dental, facial, and airway abnormalities, lacks scientific backing and has not been proven safe or effective for adult patients.

The core of the allegations centers on the assertion by the defendants that AGGA could induce substantial alterations in the adult nasomaxillary complex, including advancing the maxilla forward significantly, through mechanical force and bone growth stimulation.

Plaintiffs challenge these claims as unfounded and in direct conflict with established medical understanding, asserting that the device may, in fact, cause harm by displacing upper teeth from their sockets and leading to severe dental and skeletal issues.