United States of America

Note: At the bottom of this 13-year-old post is new 2024 information on the new Chantix cancer class action lawsuit. We are not handling these claims or any claims involving Chantix.

Chantix Lawsuits

Chantix has been a controversial drug from day one and consumer advocates have long been pushing for its removal from the very beginning. It has been associated with many side effects, including increased risk for aggressive and suicidal behavior, diabetes, and a host of other ailments.   The warning label was eventually changed on the risk of suicide and suicidal ideations (and later changed back with an acknowledgment of psychiatric events that have occurred with people on Chantix).

Some consumer complaints have been proven, some have been disproven, and the jury is still out on others. But now the data is showing something else new that Pfizer will also probably ignore: Chantix increases the risk of heart attack or stroke.

  • December 2022 Update: New lawsuit alleges that Chantix is effectively worthless because it was contaminated with nitrosamines, a likely carcinogenic.

Continue reading

Agape Baptist Church, Inc. faces accusations of negligently contributing to and causing the death of a former resident of its reformatory school. The individual passed away due to multiple organ failure at the age of 29. Kathleen Britt, the decedent’s mother, recently filed a civil lawsuit seeking to hold the reform school liable for her son’s death. This is just the latest of a growing number of lawsuits reform schools in Missouri for sexual assault and abuse.


RELATED CONTENT:

Missouri Sex Abuse Lawsuits

For over 3 decades, Dr. Robert Anderson sexually abused countless students and patients at the University of Michigan, while administrators did nothing. In 2023, the University agreed to a $490 million settlement to resolve claims by some of Dr. Anderson’s former victims. Although the deadline to participate in this settlement has now expired, Michigan may be passing a new law that will give more of Dr. Anderson’s victims the change to bring their own claims and get financial compensation.


RELATED CONTENT:

Michigan Sex Abuse Lawsuits

This is an old page on power morcellator lawsuit that was updated in 2024.

History of Power Morcellator Lawsuits

In the United States, an estimated 650,000 women per year undergo surgical hysterectomies or myomectomies to manage symptomatic uterine fibroids. Traditionally, these procedures involved removing the uterus or fibroids intact.

Power morcellators were introduced in the 1990s as tools to facilitate minimally invasive surgeries, such as hysterectomies and myomectomies, by cutting large tissues into smaller fragments that could be easily removed through small incisions.  It sounded good. These devices promised quicker recovery times, less postoperative pain, and reduced surgical trauma, quickly becoming popular in gynecological procedures.

Early Concerns and FDA Warnings

Despite their advantages, concerns about the safety of power morcellators began to surface in the early 2000s. The primary issue was the potential for spreading undetected cancerous tissues, particularly uterine sarcomas, during morcellation.

In April 2014, the FDA issued a safety communication discouraging the use of power morcellators for hysterectomy or myomectomy due to the risk of spreading undetected uterine sarcoma. The FDA’s analysis indicated that approximately 1 in 350 women undergoing these procedures for fibroids might have an unsuspected uterine sarcoma.

Following the FDA’s warning, Johnson & Johnson withdrew its power morcellators from the market. The FDA also convened an Advisory Committee meeting in July 2014 to discuss the risks associated with these devices, ultimately recommending that power morcellators should not be used in patients with known or suspected malignancy and suggesting that a black box warning be included on these devices.

Power Morcellator Lawsuits

The history here is stunning.  In December of last year, the FDA and, let’s be honest, most of the world has been sleeping on the issue of whether these morcellators can spread cancer that otherwise might have laid dormant.  Five months later, in April 2014, the FDA issued a statement urging doctors to stop using power morcellators for uterine fibroid removal and hysterectomies.

This was a complete screw up on many levels. Numerous medical studies dating back to the 1990s have identified the risks of using power morcellators. For instance, a 1991 patent for a Surgical Tissue Bag highlighted the potential for morcellation to spread malignant tissue fragments. Further studies published in prominent medical journals throughout the years continued to report on the risks and complications associated with morcellation, including the possibility of rapid cancer progression and poorer long-term outcomes for patients who underwent morcellation compared to those who had traditional surgeries.

As someone who follows the history of how the science unfolds in mass tort medical device cases, the speed of this discovery of what has always been there to be seen was breakneck.  Yet it was in front of the FDA and morcellator manufacturers’ faces all along: these morcellators are cancer spreaders.

How so?  Doctors have no way to know whether the fibroids they are breaking up with a morcellator have cancerous cells.  It is estimated that one in 350 women who undergo uterine fibroid surgery have unsuspected sarcoma contained within the uterus, while another one in 400 has the even deadlier, leiomyosarcoma (LMS).  These cancer cells can be hidden inside the uterine fibroids.  If a fibroid contains cancer cells, the cutting of the uterus with the power morcellator will cause cancer cells to spread throughout the peritoneal cavity, posing an extremely serious risk to a woman’s health.  The spreading of these cells can quickly ignite the spread of cancer.

Continue reading

The CPAP recall lawsuits against Philips have spawned a new group of related satellite lawsuits against SoClean, Inc. SoClean is a company that makes a product specifically used to sanitize the recalled CPAP devices.

Lawsuits have been filed against SoClean alleging that the company falsely marketed their product as “safe” and “healthy” for sanitizing CPAP machines and other breathing devices.

According to the lawsuits, SoClean’s product was unsafe because it emitted harmful levels of ozone gas, which exceeded the maximum safe limits set by the FDA.

On this page, our personal injury lawyers will look at Atlanta auto accident lawsuits. We will explain the relevant law as it applies to car accident cases in Georgia and we will examine the average settlement compensation payout in Atlanta car accident lawsuits.


RELATED CONTENT:

Georgia Personal Injury Law & Settlements

On this page we will explain some of the key points of law applicable to personal injury lawsuits in Nevada, including the statute of limitations. We will also explain what the average settlement payout is in Nevada personal injury lawsuits and review some recent verdicts and settlements from Nevada.

2-Year Statute of Limitations for Nevada Personal Injury Lawsuits

All statutes have laws called statutes of limitations. A statute of limitations is a law that sets a time limit on the right to bring a legal action. Once this time period expires, the injured party typically loses the right to file a lawsuit related to that particular event. Statutes of limitations serve several purposes, including ensuring that legal actions are pursued in a timely manner, preserving evidence while it is still fresh, and protecting defendants from having to defend against stale claims. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190

A growing number of lawsuits are being filed against social media companies like Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat, alleging that teens suffered physical and mental injuries after becoming addicted to social media. This page will explain the eligibility criteria for bringing a social media addiction lawsuit and how our firm screens potential social media addiction cases.

About the Social Media Addiction Lawsuits

Over the last few years, a wave of injury lawsuits have been filed against social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and others, alleging that teens became addicted to these platforms and suffered physical and mental damage as a result. The social media lawsuits are based on two primary allegations: (1) the social media companies knowingly designed their platforms to get teenagers addicted to using them, and (2) addiction to social media caused significant physical and mental harm to younger users.

This page will look at auto accident lawsuits in Virginia and their settlement value. Our injury lawyers will explain the basic laws in Virginia relating to car accidents, and we look at examples of jury payouts and settlement amounts in recent accident cases.


RELATED CONTENT:

Virginia Wrongful Death Lawsuits

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a public notice to health care providers and patients that certain hemodialysis machines manufactured by Fresenius Medical Care may be exposing users to toxic chemicals. Exposure to these toxins could cause patients to suffer neurologic conditions and hormone disorders. Our firm is not evaluating potential lawsuits against Fresenius by individuals who were harmed by this issue.

This post is part 2012 and part 2024 as we look back on this litigation, how it played out, and how much the Fresenius dialysis settlements were.

Fresenius Dialysis Machines Exposes Users to Toxic Chemicals

Contact Information