United States of America

When a dog attacks and bites someone it can cause very serious and painful physical injuries. Fortunately, most dog bite victims have the ability to get compensation by bringing a lawsuit against the dog’s owner (which should be covered by their homeowner’s insurance). On this page, we will look at Maryland dog bite lawsuits and the average settlement payouts in these cases.

Maryland Dog Bite Law

In Maryland, dog owners can be held responsible for injuries caused by their dog in almost any circumstances.

If you are physically injured in a car accident you are legally entitled to financial compensation for your injuries. A good auto accident lawyer can help you get the maximum amount of compensation for your accident. The car accident lawyers at Miller & Zois have a long track record of success in auto tort cases. Over the years, we have recovered millions on behalf of clients injured in car accidents or truck accidents.

At Miller & Zois, we focus on getting top dollar for each auto accident case we take in, even if that means going to court. Our willingness to litigate auto tort cases is well-known to the major auto insurance carriers and their claims adjusters. This reputation gives us tremendous leverage that we can use to negotiate a full-value settlement of your case.

Auto Accident Law

If an airbag recall led to injuries for you or someone close to you, there could be legal grounds to seek compensation from responsible parties.

When functioning as intended, airbags can be lifesavers, mitigating head injuries during vehicular accidents. However, if the inflator mechanism is flawed in its design, as we have in this case, it can inadvertently detonate, propelling fragments toward the driver or passenger’s head and neck. This can cause severe harm to vehicle occupants, including brain damage and death.

Should you or a loved one get injured because of a faulty recalled airbag, you might have a viable airbag lawsuit. The national mass tort lawyers at Miller & Zois are currently accepting airbag recall injury lawsuits. Contact us today at 800-553-8082 for a free consultation.

Nissan Motors Inc. is now defending a new class action lawsuit claiming that its new automated forward emergency braking system (FEB) has a design defect. The lawsuits assert that the Nissan FEB system alerts for obstacles in the road that are not actually there, causing the braking system to suddenly engage for no reason. The lawsuits are being filed by individuals who suffered significant physical injuries as a result of the defective Nissan brake system.

About the Nissan Forward Emergency Braking System

In 2019, Nissan unveiled a new smart braking system safety feature called its Forward Emergency Braking System (“FEB”), that was featured in every class of vehicle. The FEB uses radar technology to scan the road ahead for other vehicles or objects. The FEB radar is supposed to detect if the vehicle is about to collide with something, then automatically engage the brakes to prevent a collision. Its basically an emergency automatic stopping system.

This page will look at medical malpractice lawsuits based on the theory of lack of informed consent by the doctor or healthcare provider. In non-emergency situations, doctors are required to obtain a patient’s informed consent before rendering any type of medical treatment or performing any sort of procedure. If they fail to obtain informed consent, the doctor can be held liable for medical malpractice.

Lack of Informed Consent Claims

In Maryland, the law requires doctors and healthcare providers to fully explain any proposed treatment or medical procedure to the patient before moving forward. This includes a duty to explain both the benefits of the procedure or treatment, and warning the patient of any material risks or dangers inherent in the therapy or procedure. The explanation from the doctor must enable the patient to reasonably understand the risks and benefits and make an intelligent and informed choice about whether or not to undergo such treatment.

This page will explain how underinsurance and uninsured motorist insurance (UIM) work and how you can access it to get compensation for an accident claim. We will also look at examples of recent settlements and verdicts in actual auto accident cases involving UIM claims.

What is Uninsured Motorist Coverage?

Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage (UIM) is the part of your auto insurance policy that is supposed to pay for losses or damages caused by another driver when that at-fault driver either: (a) has no insurance, or (b) does not have enough insurance to cover all of your damages. The best way to help you understand how UIM coverage works is with hypothetical examples.

Riding a motorcycle can be extremely dangerous because in the event of an accident with another vehicle (usually a car) the motorcycle rider is left completely unprotected and exposed. Even a relatively minor, low speed accident between a car and a motorcycle can have catastrophic consequences for anyone on the motorcycle.

This page will look at some of the most common causes of collisions between cars and motorcycles and how the motorcycle rider can get financial compensation for their injuries by filing a motorcycle accident lawsuit.


RELATED CONTENT:

Last year,  the FDA announced a Class I recall of the Baxter Sigma Spectrum infusion pumps due to a defective alarm that has already resulted in 3 patient deaths and 51 serious injuries. Patients who were injured by a malfunctioning Baxter infusion pump may be able to file product liability lawsuits and seek financial compensation from the manufacturer.

This year, in September, there was B. Braun infusion pump recall. We talk about both here.

What is an Infusion Pump?

I think it is useful to write about jury verdicts and give thoughts as to why I think the jury found as they did and the issues that arose in the case.  Why?  Because people are looking online for information about the value of their cases. So we summarize one case, Mayrink v. Luchsinger, the long way and then give sample settlements and verdicts in more Florida disc injury cases.On our website, we provide a ton of verdict information for victims, many of whom suffered a herniated disc.  This helps give some lens to the value of a case.  But it hardly tells the real story of the claim and why a jury may have valued it how they did.  So hopefully posts like this help educate those looking for answers.

Facts of Mayrink v. Luchsinger

This is a herniated disc case.  The plaintiff, a painter by trade, crashed into a median strip after being pushed off the road by the defendant who must have changed lanes without looking.   Usually, in these lane change cases, you almost invariably have a liability fight on your hands.  Defense counsel in this case, probably wisely, admitted responsibility.  Why is this wise?  Defense counsel often admits liability because they know if they fight and lose there is real credibility lost on the scope of the injuries battle.   By admitting fault, the defendant seems more credible and honest than if they fight on liability and lose.  Continue reading

Contact Information