Close
Updated:

L’Oreal Dark & Lovely Lawsuit

Recent scientific evidence has shown that long-term use of chemical hair relaxer products can increase the risk of uterine cancer and other hormone-related health conditions. This has prompted hair relaxer lawsuits against cosmetic companies like L’Oréal. These lawsuits allege that L’Oréal’s popular hair relaxer product, Dark & Lovely, caused uterine cancer and other injuries.

In this post, we will look at the new scientific evidence and the allegations that are being made against L’Oréal regarding its Dark & Lovely product.

Dark and Lovely Relaxer Lawsuit Updates

February 5, 2025: In a new lawsuit filed yesterday, the family of a deceased woman from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, sued L’Oréal USA, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others, alleging that the decedent, who had been using the defendants’ hair relaxer products since 1949, developed uterine cancer, ultimately leading to her death.

The complaint, directly filed in the MDL, claims that the defendants negligently designed, manufactured, and marketed their hair relaxer products without adequate warnings about the potential health risks. It further alleges that the companies misrepresented the safety of their products, engaged in fraudulent concealment of known dangers, and violated consumer protection laws.

The lawsuit seeks damages under multiple legal theories, including strict liability, negligence, breach of warranties, fraudulent misrepresentation, and wrongful death. The plaintiff, acting as the personal representative of the estate, is also pursuing claims for survival action and punitive damages, arguing that the defendants’ conduct was reckless and demonstrated a willful disregard for consumer safety.

February 4, 2025: There are now over 9,800 hair relaxer lawsuits pending cases in the multidistrict litigation.

February 2, 2025: On Friday, Judge Rowland finalized a structured bellwether trial schedule for the hair relaxer MDL, with the first trials not expected to begin until 2027.

If you find this upsetting, you are not alone.  These trials are still a way off and that means settlement for victims is not in the immediate time horizon. While the wait for MDL trials is frustrating, it is, unfortunately, the reality of mass tort litigation.

The good news is that state court trials are likely to come quicker, which will significantly impact the pressure on defendants to settle. If you are a plaintiff, the key takeaway is that the litigation is progressing, but patience will be required

January 31, 2024: There is no question that L’Oréal is the primary target defendant in the hair relaxer lawsuits. Why?

First, it is because it is one of the largest and most well-known manufacturers of chemical hair straightening products. For decades, L’Oréal has produced and marketed a wide range of hair relaxers under various brand names that have been widely used by consumers, particularly, obviously, in the Black community.  So they have a lot of market share.

More practically, L’Oréal’s is the big fish. It has vast resources, making it a strategic target for lawsuits. So many of the companies in this litigation are more mom-and-pop or close to it. As one of the leading beauty companies worldwide, L’Oréal is seen as having the financial capacity to pay large settlements or judgments. This, combined with the widespread use of their products and the serious health conditions being alleged, has put the company at the forefront of the hair relaxer litigation.

January 9, 2025: In preparation for the status conference tomorrow, hair relaxer lawyers submitted a joint status report. This report provided updates on various aspects of the litigation, including discovery progress, motions pending before the court, and coordination efforts between the parties. The judge is expected to set bellwether trial dates soon, maybe at this hearing.

November 10, 2024: Judge Mary Rowland denied a motion to dismiss a proposed class action lawsuit against  L’Oréal USA and Revlon.  Our firm is focused on wrongful death and personal injury claims. This is something different.

The lawsuit seeks reimbursement for consumers who purchased chemical hair relaxer products without being informed of potential cancer risks. The class action aims to recover economic damages and punitive damages and establish medical monitoring funds for consumers at increased risk of health issues due to these products. This decision allows the litigation to proceed, putting more pressure on L’Oréal and the other defendants that will impact the wrongful death and other personal injury claims.

October 14, 2024: The marketing of hair relaxers by companies like L’Oréal has disproportionately targeted Black women, embedding an unspoken layer of discrimination within the lawsuits that we should speak frankly about.

For decades, these products were framed as essential tools for beauty and professionalism, subtly teaching that natural Black hair was something to be fixed. All the while, companies like L’Oréal reaped profits while sidestepping the health risks—such as uterine cancer and fertility issues—that their products posed. This aggressive marketing normalized the use of harmful chemicals in Black communities, placing financial gain above consumer safety without offering proper warnings.

Now, I tried to find the racial makeup of  L’Oréal’s board of directors when this all started.  I came up empty.  But I’m guessing it likely mirrored trends prevalent among major global corporations at he time—dominated by white men.

Institutional negligence and taking advantage of people who have been taken advantage of since before we became a country is an unspoken core issue in the litigation. Ultimately, it is like selling umbrellas that leak, but only to communities that live under perpetual rain. A cynical profit strategy built on exploitation.

October 2, 2024: Last month, 200 new cases were added to the hair relaxer class action lawsuit. However, in September, the multidistrict litigation (MDL) saw a reduction, with 98 cases being dismissed, lowering the total number of active cases to 8,393.

September 24, 2024: The plaintiff filed a motion asking the court to compel defendant Strength of Nature (the company that makes Just for Me and Soft & Beautiful) to produce previously withheld documents related to a “uterine study.” The company previously withheld these documents in discovery on the grounds that they were “work product” produced in anticipation of litigation. The defense argument is weak and the judge is expected to rule in favor of the plaintiffs.

September 1, 2024: In July, the hair relax MDL only added about a dozen new cases. That volume jumped back up in August, however, as over 200 new cases were added to the MDL. That marks the highest monthly volume in this MDL since last year. There are now 8,489 pending cases.

August 4, 2024: In July, only around a dozen new cases were added to the hair relaxer class action MDL, bringing the total number of pending cases to over 8,200. Despite this increase, the MDL has been fluctuating around 8,000 cases for months, following a period of rapid growth as one of last year’s fastest-growing mass torts.

July 3, 2024:  Selective Way Insurance has asked a Georgia federal judge to relieve it from the obligation to defend House of Cheatham, a defendant in the cancer-causing hair relaxer MDL. The insurer argues that House of Cheatham’s 2021 asset transfer, from a corporation to an LLC, did not include the transfer of its insurance coverage because Selective Way had not consented to the policy assignment. Despite the restructuring, House of Cheatham maintains that its insurance coverage should remain unaffected.

June 2, 2024: As of June 1, 2024, there are 8,170 total pending cases in the hair relaxer class action MDL. That is actually a small decrease from the number of pending cases we saw last month. Loreal remains one of the primary defendants being named in these incoming cases.

May 3, 2024: Professor Maura Grossman has been formally appointed as Special Master in the hair relaxer MDL. Grossman was appointed over the strong objections of the defendants who claimed that she had a conflict of interest based on the fact that she had recently been working for the defense on technology-assisted review issues.

L’Oreal

L’Oreal is the biggest cosmetics company in the world. Headquartered in France, L’Oreal is a global entity with product sales and offices across the globe.  L’Oreal can trace its roots back to 1919 when a French chemist developed and patented a line of hair dye products.

By 1950, L’Oreal had over 100 employees and was primarily focused on hair coloring. Over the next few decades, however, the company underwent a massive growth phase which was fueled by the explosion of the personal cosmetics market. L’Oreal rapidly expanded out of just hair dyes and into cleansers, makeup, fragrance, and other products. The company now has over 500 brands and 85,000 employees across the globe.

Globally, the L’Oreal parent company (a French corporation) operates through a number of international subsidiaries. The largest of these international units is L’Oreal USA, Inc., which is headquartered in New York City. L’Oreal is a publicly traded company, but private investors own only a small percentage of its shares.

L’Oreal has a market capitalization of $189 billion, which makes it one of the biggest companies in the world. In 2021, L’Oreal posted total revenue of $32.2 billion and net income of $4.6 billion.

SoftSheen-Caron, a L’Oreal subsidiary, also makes Softsheen-Carson Optimum, another hair relaxer at issue in this litigation.

Dark & Lovely and Other L’Oreal Hair Relaxers

Hair relaxers or hair straighteners are products used mostly by African American women to flatten their tightly curled hair. L’Oreal currently manufactures Dark & Lovely, which is the leading brand of chemical hair relaxer in the U.S.

The Dark & Lovely hair relaxer brand was first launched by a company called Carson Products back in 1978. It was the first hair relaxer product that did not use lye, which made it less likely to irritate the scalp. Dark & Lovely went on to become the dominant brand in the chemical hair relaxer market. In 1998, the Dark & Lovely brand was acquired by L’Oreal.

Brand Product Name Category
Dark and Lovely Beautiful Beginnings No-Mistake Smooth Relaxer Children’s Relaxer
Dark and Lovely Beautiful Beginnings No Mistake Curl Softener Children’s Curl Softener
Dark and Lovely Healthy Gloss 5 Shea Moisture No Lye Relaxer No-Lye Relaxer
Dark and Lovely Triple Nourished Silkening Relaxer Silkening Relaxer
Optimum Salon Haircare Defy Breakage No-Lye Relaxer No-Lye Relaxer
L’Oréal Paris Neutralizing X-Tenso Hair Straightening Relaxer Hair Straightening
Optimum Salon Haircare Amla Legend Relaxer Herbal Relaxer
Optimum Care Bodifying Relaxer Volume-Boosting Relaxer
Optimum Multi-Mineral Reduced pH Crème Relaxer Low-pH Relaxer
Bantu No Base Relaxer No-Base Relaxer
Ultra Precise No-Lye Conditioning Relaxer Conditioning Relaxer
Mizani Butter Blend Relaxer Butter-Infused Relaxer

History of Hair Straightening

Garrett Augustus Morgan, a Black inventor, discovered and created a system that would permanently straighten afro-textured hair, eliminating the issue of shrinkage.

After conducting successful tests on a dog with curly hair and even his own hair, Morgan transformed his chemical solution into a gel-hair product.

This resulted in the creation of G.A. Morgan Hair Refining Cream, which was introduced to the market in 1913. Morgan’s invention served as a stepping stone for the development of alkaline relaxers and other chemical-based permanent hair straightening products in the Black hair care industry.

In 1971, the first lye relaxer was manufactured by Dark and Lovely. The formula contained sodium hydroxide, water, petroleum jelly, mineral oils, and emulsifiers. However, in the 1970s, lye relaxer users and manufacturers observed that the formula stripped proteins from the hair strand, resulting in hair thinning and breakage. Over time, other chemical relaxer manufacturers like developed herbal and botanical hair relaxer formulas that have toxic chemicals as we dig into more below.

New Evidence Links Dark & Lovely to Uterine Cancer

Hair relaxer products like Dark & Lovely contain a lot of strong chemicals because those chemicals are cheap and they straighten hair.  Many of the chemicals in Dark & Lovely are known to disrupt the endocrine system, which interferes with hormone production.

In October 2022, the results of a major long-term study by NIH called the Sister Study were published in a leading medical journal. The study results were groundbreaking. They showed a clear link between the use of hair relaxers like Dark & Lovely and higher rates of uterine cancer. According to the study, women who used products like Dark & Lovely at least 4 times per year increased their risk of uterine cancer by 150%.

Chronic exposure to the chemicals in hair straightener products has also been linked to increased risks of breast cancer, and other health conditions involving the female reproductive system such as uterine fibroids and endometriosis.

Dark & Lovely Lawsuits

The publication of the NIH Sister Study has catalyzed a wave of product liability lawsuits against major cosmetic companies, including L’Oréal who owns Dark & Lovely, due to claims linking the use of chemical hair relaxers to uterine cancer and other health complications. This large epidemiological study found evidence suggesting that women who used hair relaxer products frequently had a higher risk of developing uterine cancer, uterine fibroids, and other hormone-related diseases. The findings hit particularly hard for Black women, who have historically been the primary consumers of these products and may have used them from a young age. So many of these women have been using these products and have been exposed to these chemicals for a long, long time.

The lawsuits argue that companies like L’Oréal marketed their relaxers, such as Dark & Lovely, as safe despite knowing or having reason to suspect that long-term exposure to the chemicals in these products posed serious health risks. Plaintiffs claim the companies failed to warn consumers about the potential dangers of regular use, including the risk of cancer. The suits focus on harmful chemicals, including phthalates and other endocrine disruptors, found in these products. These chemicals can interfere with hormone regulation, which is believed to play a role in the development of cancers and reproductive health issues.

All federal lawsuits against L’Oréal and other manufacturers of chemical hair relaxers have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation in Chicago’s Northern District of Illinois. The MDL process is designed to streamline complex cases involving many similar claims by consolidating them before one judge—in this case, Judge Mary M. Rowland.

Plaintiffs in these lawsuits allege that products like L’Oréal’s hair relaxers contain harmful chemicals linked to uterine cancer, fibroids, and other reproductive health issues. By bringing all federal cases together, the MDL allows for more efficient pretrial proceedings, including discovery and motions, reducing redundancy and promoting consistency across rulings.

The MDL has been going on for over two years. Centralizing the cases has allowed lawyers on both sides to conduct coordinated discovery, including depositions and document production from L’Oréal and other defendants. The MDL also sets the stage for bellwether trials, which will serve as test cases to gauge how juries might respond to the evidence and legal arguments. These early trials can influence settlement negotiations and potentially lead to a global settlement for all victims.

Potential Settlement Amounts of Dark & Lovely Lawsuits

Our hair relaxer attorneys believe that a successful Dark & Lovely lawsuit involving uterine cancer could have a potential settlement value range of $300,000 to $1.75 million.

Take this number with many grains of salt.  It is early in this litigation.  Liability has not been established.  Settlement compensation projections are always speculation but particularly so this early in the litigation.  But if these Dark & Lovely lawsuits are as viable as we believe they will be, the settlement values could be high.  And L’Oreal is worth a great deal more money – nearly $300 billion – than most defendants in large class action lawsuits.

This is a wide value range simply because uterine cancer cases can present a wide range of circumstances. In an older, post-menopausal woman, uterine cancer is treatable and has a good survival rate. In cases involving younger women, however, treatment for uterine cancer often leaves them unable to have children and the cancer itself tends to be more aggressive.

Dark & Lovely lawsuits involving other injuries, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis, will have lower potential settlement value for two reasons. First, the causation evidence linking these injuries to hair relaxers is less compelling. Second, these health conditions are not as serious as uterine cancer, which reduces their potential settlement value.

Hair Relaxer and Hair Color Lawsuits

L’Oréal is currently facing two major product liability lawsuits: the hair relaxer lawsuit and the hair dye lawsuit, both of which allege that the company failed to warn consumers about the risks associated with its products.

Our law firm is focused on the hair relaxer lawsuits.  The L’Oréal hair color lawsuit is a similar but separate legal battle. These claims center around permanent hair dye products linked to breast cancer and leukemia. Unlike the l’oreal relaxer lawsuit, which primarily affects Black women due to targeted marketing, the hair dye lawsuit impacts a broader consumer base. Scientific studies, including a 2019 NIH report, have suggested that frequent use of hair dye may significantly increase the risk of breast cancer, particularly among Black women.

This case includes Dark and Lovely hair dye and other L’Oréal brands like Garnier and Clairol, which plaintiffs allege contain carcinogenic compounds such as aromatic amines and coal-tar derivatives. Unlike the hair relaxer lawsuits, these hair dye chemical exposure lawsuits are not yet consolidated into an MDL, meaning cases are proceeding on an individual or class action basis in state and federal courts.

The Pressure on Black Women

Before we close this post, we should talk about the systemic problems that got us here. Prejudices based on hair style, particularly in the workplace, are something many Black women have experienced.  This discrimination is often targeted toward women with natural hair or hairstyles commonly associated with their racial, ethnic, or cultural identities.

Hair discrimination can take many forms, including policies that prohibit or restrict certain hairstyles, dress codes that require individuals to conform to small-minded Eurocentric beauty standards, or discriminatory comments or behavior from co-workers or supervisors.

This is why many women feel compelled to ignore the risks and continue to use hair relaxers.

The CROWN Act

The CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair) is a law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of hair texture and protective hairstyles, such as braids, locs, twists, and knots. The act aims to prevent discrimination against individuals with natural hair or hairstyles commonly associated with their racial, ethnic, or cultural identities.

The CROWN Act was first introduced in California in 2019 and was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on July 3, 2019. Since then, several states have enacted similar laws, including New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Colorado, Washington, Maryland, and Nebraska.

On July 1, 2021, the CROWN Act was signed into law at the federal level by President Joe Biden, making it illegal to discriminate against individuals based on their hair texture or protective hairstyles in the workplace and public schools. The CROWN Act of 2021 amends existing federal civil rights laws to include hair discrimination as a prohibited form of racial or national origin discrimination.

The CROWN Act Does Not Solve Discrimination

While the CROWN Act is an important step towards eliminating discrimination based on hair texture and protective hairstyles, it is not a comprehensive solution to all forms of discrimination.

Discrimination can take many forms, including race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, age, and religion, among others. The CROWN Act specifically addresses discrimination based on hair texture and hairstyles but does not address other forms of discrimination that individuals may experience.

Furthermore, discrimination is a complex issue that is deeply rooted in social, cultural, and economic structures. Even with legal protections in place, discriminatory attitudes and behaviors can still persist, and it may take time and continued efforts to change societal norms and eliminate all forms of discrimination.  The Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not end racism and the CROWN Act won’t end prejudice.

So while the CROWN Act is an important step toward promoting inclusivity and diversity, it is just one piece of a larger mosaic.  Additional laws and policies, along with education and awareness-raising efforts, are needed to address the root causes of discrimination and take this ridiculous pressure off Black women.

Can we pin these deeply rooted prejudices on L’Oreal?  No.  But they sure were in a position to profit from it, weren’t they?  And they had an obligation to make a safe product and tell women about the risks associated with hair relaxers and all the toxins in these chemical hair straighteners.

Contact Us About Filing a Dark & Lovely Lawsuit Against L’Oreal

Our firm is currently investigating product liability cases alleging that chemicals in L’Oreal’s Dark & Lovely hair relaxer cause uterine cancer and other forms of cancer. If you think you qualify for a lawsuit involving chemical hair straightener, contact our office today for a free consultation at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation.

Contact Us